SQE1 FLK1 Business Law and Practice Sample Questions July 2024

Last Update: 23 July 2024


The answers, solutions, and explanations provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of potential responses to the given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers. Alternative valid responses may exist for many questions. If you believe an answer is incorrect or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will make the necessary amendments if we deem it necessary. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising from the use of the content on this page. This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods and procedures presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee any specific outcomes in academic testing, whether formal or informal.


Question 1


James and Laura have invested in a tech startup. James is a silent partner who initially opted out of any operational decisions, providing solely financial support, while Laura took on the role of managing partner. Six months after the launch, James starts attending board meetings and influencing hiring decisions due to concerns over the startup's slow growth.


Based on James's increased involvement in operations, what implications does this have for his liability in relation to the company's obligations should the startup incur significant debts?


  • A. His liability is limited to the value of his initial investment.
  • B. His liability does not change unless he is officially made a managing partner.
  • C. He becomes fully liable for the company's debts, akin to Laura.
  • D. His liability increases by a fixed percentage relative to his initial contribution.
  • E. His liability includes his initial investment and any profits he may have received.

Click to reveal answer

The correct answer is C. When James begins actively participating in the strategic and operational decisions of the partnership, he risks losing his status as a silent partner with limited liability. This increased involvement can make him fully liable for the partnership's debts, just as Laura, the managing partner, according to principles under the Limited Partnerships Act 1907 and the Partnership Act 1890 regarding the role and liability of partners.


Option A is incorrect because James's liability extends beyond just his initial investment once he starts taking part in the management of the company.


Option B is incorrect because the designation or title does not solely determine liability; the actual involvement in management activities does.


Option D is incorrect as liability for debts in a partnership does not typically increase by a fixed percentage but may become unlimited upon participation in management.


Option E is incorrect because it does not accurately represent the full scope of liability that can be assumed, which encompasses the entire debt of the partnership, not just an allocation based on investment and profits.


Question 2


Amber Enterprises, a technology firm in England, has experienced a booming growth in revenue due to the launch of a groundbreaking software product in the fiscal year ending March 2022. With the increase in profits, the board of directors is exploring effective strategies to optimize their tax liability for the company.


Which of the following strategies would legally enable Amber Enterprises to reduce its corporation tax liability for the fiscal year ending March 2022?


  • A. Electing for the Patent Box regime to apply to relevant profits.
  • B. Delaying invoice issuance for services rendered until the next fiscal year.
  • C. Applying carry-back relief for trading losses from future years.
  • D. Transferring profits to an overseas subsidiary in a lower-tax jurisdiction.
  • E. None of the above.

Click to reveal answer

The correct answer is A. Electing for the Patent Box regime to apply to relevant profits allows companies to benefit from a lower rate of corporation tax (10%) on profits generated from patented inventions and certain other innovations. This regime aims to encourage companies to maintain and commercialize patented inventions in the UK.


Option B is incorrect because delaying the issuance of invoices to shift income to another fiscal year can be considered tax avoidance and is against HMRC regulations.


Option C is incorrect because carry-back relief for trading losses allows companies to offset losses against profits of previous years, not to apply losses from future years retroactively.


Option D is incorrect because transferring profits to an overseas subsidiary could be considered tax avoidance and likely violates anti-avoidance laws, subjecting the company to penalties.


Option E is incorrect because there is a legitimate and legal strategy to reduce corporation tax liability, which is electing for the Patent Box regime.


Question 3


Thomas is in the process of setting up a boutique consultancy firm specializing in environmental sustainability. He is aware that adhering to the legal framework is crucial for the seamless incorporation of his company. Among the various documents required, Thomas knows that the Memorandum of Association is essential.


What is a mandatory element that must be included in the Memorandum of Association for Thomas's company to be successfully registered?


  • A. A detailed list of the environmental sustainability projects the company intends to undertake.
  • B. The names and addresses of all the company directors.
  • C. The company's proposed registered office address.
  • D. A declaration of the company's commitment to ethical business practices.
  • E. Projected financial statements for the first three years.

Click to reveal answer

The correct answer is C. The company's proposed registered office address is a mandatory element that must be included in the Memorandum of Association for it to be accepted by Companies House. This requirement ensures that there is a registered physical location associated with the company for legal and communication purposes.


Option A is incorrect because, while having a business plan is important, the Memorandum of Association does not require a detailed list of projects the company intends to undertake.


Option B is incorrect because the names and addresses of company directors are not included in the Memorandum of Association; this information is provided in other documents during the company registration process.


Option D is incorrect because, although ethical commitments are significant, they do not form part of the required information in the Memorandum of Association for the purpose of company registration.


Option E is incorrect because projected financial statements are not a requirement for the Memorandum of Association. Financial projections are relevant for business planning and perhaps for securing investment but are not required by Companies House for registration purposes.


Question 4


James is a freelance graphic designer who has just concluded his first year of self-employment. He approaches you for advice on his tax situation. He explains that his earnings for the year include proceeds from client projects, occasional photography services, and the sale of digital assets online. James is aware that the tax system is progressive and involves multiple rates but is unsure how to categorize his various income streams for accurate tax reporting.


What would be your initial advice to James to ensure he correctly categorizes his income for tax purposes?


  • A. Advise James to lump all his earnings together and apply the basic rate across the total.
  • B. Recommend that James separates his income into self-employment earnings, other income, and capital gains to accurately calculate his tax.
  • C. Suggest James focus on his highest earning stream, client projects, to estimate his tax bracket first.
  • D. Tell James to prioritize capital gains tax calculation over his self-employment income and other earnings.
  • E. Encourage James to deduct his business expenses from his photography services income before considering other incomes.

Click to reveal answer

The correct answer is B. Initially advising James to separate his income into self-employment earnings, other income, and capital gains is crucial for accurately determining his tax liabilities. This categorization is key as different types of income may be taxed at different rates or have different allowances and exemptions associated with them. Accurate classification ensures a comprehensive understanding of tax obligations under the progressive tax system in England and Wales.


Option A is incorrect because simply lumping all earnings together without considering the different categories and tax rates applicable to each could lead to inaccurate tax calculations and potential overpayment or underpayment of taxes.


Option C is incorrect because while it may seem practical to estimate taxes based on the highest income stream, this overlooks the nuanced approach required for dealing with multiple income streams that are taxed differently.


Option D is incorrect because prioritizing capital gains tax over other types of income disregards the need to accurately categorize and calculate tax on all income sources correctly, leading to potential inaccuracies in tax calculations.


Option E is incorrect because although deducting business expenses from specific streams of income is important, it should not precede the categorization of income types for accurate tax calculation.


Question 5


Jonah, a successful software developer, operated as a freelancer under the name Jonah's Coding Solutions. Seeing an opportunity to expand, Jonah decided to form a limited company named JCS Solutions Ltd, into which he transferred all his freelance business assets, including client contracts and proprietary software. Jonah seeks advice on the corporation tax implications of this transfer, especially concerning the value of the proprietary software.


What should Jonah be aware of regarding the tax implications of transferring his proprietary software to JCS Solutions Ltd?


  • A. Transferring proprietary software as an asset to JCS Solutions Ltd will result in immediate personal income tax liability for Jonah.
  • B. Jonah can claim roll-over relief on the transfer of the proprietary software to defer any corporation tax liability.
  • C. JCS Solutions Ltd must recognise the proprietary software at its original cost, avoiding any corporation tax implications.
  • D. The transfer of proprietary software to JCS Solutions Ltd may be treated as a disposal at market value for Jonah, potentially triggering a capital gains tax liability.
  • E. JCS Solutions Ltd is eligible for an immediate tax deduction for the market value of the proprietary software as a business expense.

Click to reveal answer

The correct answer is D. The transfer of proprietary software to JCS Solutions Ltd may be considered a disposal at market value for Jonah, potentially leading to a capital gains tax exposure depending on the appreciation of the asset's value since its creation.


Option A is incorrect because the transfer of assets to a company controlled by the transferring individual mainly has implications for capital gains tax, not personal income tax.


Option B is incorrect because roll-over relief generally applies to tangible assets used in the business, and its application to intangible assets like software is more complex and not automatically available.


Option C is incorrect because for tax purposes, assets transferred into a company are typically required to be recognised at market value, which can have implications for both the individual and the corporation in terms of tax liabilities.


Option E is incorrect because while the company can recognise the proprietary software as an asset, it does not receive an immediate tax deduction for the market value of the software as an expense. Instead, tax treatment would typically involve considerations around amortisation and possible research and development credits.


Question 6


Samantha, a director of GreenScape Innovations, a startup focused on sustainable urban development, overhears in a strategic planning meeting that the company is about to enter a lucrative partnership with a leading renewable energy firm. Recognizing the potential for significant company growth from this partnership, Samantha advises her close friend to purchase shares in GreenScape Innovations before the partnership is announced to the public.


Given the responsibilities and legal obligations of directors under the Companies Act 2006, particularly in terms of confidential information and personal gain, how should Samantha's actions be analyzed?


  • A. Samantha's actions are justifiable since she did not profit directly from the information.
  • B. As the information was about to become public, Samantha's actions do not constitute a misuse of information.
  • C. Samantha's advice to her friend violates her fiduciary duties by leveraging confidential information for indirect personal gain.
  • D. Since Samantha's actions could potentially lead to an increase in shareholder value, they do not breach her duties as a director.
  • E. Samantha's effort to induce confidence in the company's future by leveraging inside information is in line with her duties to promote the company's success.

Click to reveal answer

The correct answer is C. Samantha has breached her fiduciary duties by leveraging confidential information for the benefit of a close friend, which can be considered an indirect personal gain.


Option A is incorrect because even indirect benefits stemming from the misuse of confidential information violate a director's fiduciary duties under the Companies Act 2006.


Option B is incorrect because the misuse of confidential or insider information is prohibited, irrespective of whether it is about to become public.


Option D is incorrect because the potential increase in shareholder value does not justify the misuse of confidential information. Directors must act within the legal framework, which prohibits such actions.


Option E is incorrect because leveraging inside information to boost confidence in the company's future, in this manner, contravenes the legal obligations and fiduciary duties of a director.


Question 7


Marble Arch Tech, a technology start-up specializing in artificial intelligence, has incurred substantial trade debts over its initial two years of operation. To facilitate a crucial phase of expansion, the company secured a loan from Venture Bank plc two years ago, offering the company's patents and intellectual property as security under an arrangement consistent with the provisions of the Companies Act 2006. Given the failure to meet several repayment milestones, Venture Bank plc is now contemplating enforcement options concerning the security held.


Given the nature of the security offered by Marble Arch Tech, which type of enforcement is Venture Bank plc most likely to pursue?


  • A. Appointing a fixed charge receiver.
  • B. Initiating a winding-up petition.
  • C. Appointing an administrative receiver.
  • D. Taking possession of the secured assets directly.
  • E. Seeking a court order for sale of the patented technology.

Click to reveal answer

The correct answer is C. Appointing an administrative receiver allows the secured creditor to take control of all or most of the company's assets, including intangible assets such as patents and intellectual property. This is a common enforcement option for secured debts under the Companies Act 2006 when the security involves a comprehensive range of the company's assets.


Option A is incorrect because a 'fixed charge receiver' is generally appointed over specific physical assets rather than intangible assets like patents and intellectual property.


Option B is incorrect because initiating a winding-up petition is a measure to dissolve the company, not directly related to the enforcement of a secured loan based on the company’s assets.


Option D is incorrect because taking possession of secured assets directly is more applicable to tangible assets, and it can be complex when dealing with intellectual property due to their intangible nature.


Option E is incorrect because seeking a court order for the sale of the patented technology is a possible course of action, but it is not the most likely initial enforcement option pursued by a bank in this context, especially when administrative receivership offers a directly applicable solution.


Question 8


Jackson Textiles Ltd, a family-run business specializing in luxury fabrics, has been operating at a loss for several months. In a bid to stabilize the company, the board decided to transfer ownership of their most valuable looms to a new entity controlled by the family, FabriCraft Ltd, significantly below market value three months prior to filing for insolvency. The rationale provided was to secure new financing arrangements to save the business. Creditors, however, believe this move was detrimental to their interests.


Which action under the Insolvency Act is most likely to be the basis for the creditors to challenge the transfer of the looms to FabriCraft Ltd?


  • A. The transfer was not subjected to an independent valuation.
  • B. The company was already insolvent at the time of the transfer.
  • C. The transfer constitutes a preference to a connected party.
  • D. The board did not seek unanimous shareholder consent for the transfer.
  • E. The transfer violates terms of previous contracts with creditors.

Click to reveal answer

The correct answer is C. The transaction can be challenged as a preference under the Insolvency Act, since it involves transferring assets to a connected party (FabriCraft Ltd, controlled by the family) below market value shortly before filing for insolvency. This act could be seen as trying to put the assets beyond the reach of the general body of creditors, favoring the interests of the connected party over others.


Option A is incorrect because while an independent valuation is best practice to ensure fairness, the absence of an independent valuation itself is not sufficient grounds to challenge a transaction under the Insolvency Act without evidence that the transaction unfairly impacted creditors.


Option B is incorrect because a company does not need to be insolvent at the time of the transfer for the transaction to be challenged; the timing in relation to insolvency proceedings and the nature of the transaction are the relevant considerations.


Option D is incorrect because unanimous shareholder consent is not a typical requirement for asset transfers. What matters more from a legal standpoint in the context of insolvency is whether the transaction unfairly disadvantages creditors.


Option E is incorrect because the specific issue here is not about violating contractual terms with creditors but rather the preferential treatment of connected parties through the transfer of assets at undervalue.


Question 9


Lucy, Marco, and Nia constitute a partnership operating a boutique design firm, with a financial year that concludes on the 31st December. Lucy and Marco have been contributing to the partnership since its inception on 1st January 2018. Nia was welcomed into the partnership on the 1st January 2021. According to the partnership agreement, profits are to be allocated equally among the partners. The profits for the year ending 31st December 2021 amounted to £210,000, and for the year ending on 31st December 2022, the profits were £270,000.


Under the current UK taxation rules for partnerships, how much of the partnership's profits will Nia need to include in her income tax assessment for her first and second tax years?


  • A. £70,000 for the first year and £90,000 for the second year.
  • B. £35,000 for the first year and £90,000 for the second year.
  • C. £0 for the first year and £90,000 for the second year.
  • D. £35,000 for the first year and £45,000 for the second year.
  • E. £70,000 for the first year and £45,000 for the second year.

Click to reveal answer

The correct answer is A. Nia's portion of the profits to be assessed for income tax in her first tax year would be calculated based on the partnership profits for the year ending on 31st December 2021, which are £210,000. As the profits are divided equally among the three partners, her share would be 1/3 of £210,000, equating to £70,000. For the second tax year, Nia's share would be 1/3 of the profits for the year ending on 31st December 2022, being £270,000, which equals £90,000.


Option B is incorrect because it does not reflect the accurate share of profits based on the partnership agreement for Nia's first year.


Option C is incorrect because it incorrectly suggests that Nia would not be entitled to any share of the profits in her first year of joining the partnership.


Option D is incorrect because it both underestimates the share for the first year and mistakenly reduces the share for the second year, not adhering to the equal distribution of profits as per the partnership agreement.


Option E is incorrect as it incorrectly asserts that Nia would receive the whole sum of profits in her first year and then diminishes her share in the second year, which does not align with the partnership’s profit-sharing agreement.


Question 10


Following a strategic alignment, EcoTech Innovations, a company specializing in green technology, decides to split its renewable energy division into a separate entity named GreenFuture Enterprises. Prior to the split, EcoTech Innovations had entered into multiple long-term agreements with suppliers and clients, specifically for products developed within the renewable energy division. The CEO of EcoTech Innovations is concerned about the continuity of these agreements post-division and seeks to understand the best course of action to ensure business continuity and adherence to legal and ethical standards.


What should be the first action of the CEO of EcoTech Innovations to ensure the smooth transition of contracts to GreenFuture Enterprises?


  • A. Announce the division and automatically assign all renewable energy-related contracts to GreenFuture Enterprises.
  • B. Review the terms of the existing contracts to determine the possibilities for assignment or need for renegotiation with the counterparties.
  • C. Declare all previous contracts related to the renewable energy division as void and initiate new contract negotiations under GreenFuture Enterprises.
  • D. Assume the contracts are transferable and proceed with business operations without consulting the other parties to the agreements.
  • E. Sell the contracts to a third party, and then have GreenFuture Enterprises negotiate new agreements with that third party.

Click to reveal answer

The correct answer is B. The CEO should review the terms of the existing contracts to determine the possibilities for assignment or need for renegotiation with the counterparties. This ensures compliance with legal requirements and respects the rights and obligations of all stakeholders involved.


Option A is incorrect because the automatic assignment of contracts without review or the consent of all parties may violate the terms of those contracts and could lead to legal complications.


Option C is incorrect because declaring previous contracts void without due process could breach contractual obligations, harm business relationships, and potentially result in legal penalties.


Option D is incorrect because assuming contracts are transferable without verifying the terms can lead to breaches of agreement and legal disputes. It disregards the interests and rights of the other parties.


Option E is incorrect because selling contracts to a third party without the consent of all original parties involved may breach the terms of the agreement and does not directly address the transition to a new entity in a legal or ethical manner.