## Facts

- Louisiana enacted Act No. 66 of 1894, imposing a \$1,000 fine per offense on any person who, within Louisiana, did any act to obtain marine insurance on in-state property from a marine insurer that had not complied with Louisiana’s requirements for foreign insurers.
- E. Allgeyer & Co., a Louisiana commercial firm shipping cotton from New Orleans to foreign ports, held an open marine insurance policy issued by Atlantic Mutual Insurance Company, a New York insurer.
- The insurance relationship was formed in New York, with premiums payable in New York and losses payable in New York.
- After shipping cotton from New Orleans, Allgeyer & Co. mailed from Louisiana a letter of advice/certificate to Atlantic Mutual in New York on October 27, 1894, notifying the insurer of a shipment covered by the open policy.
- Louisiana treated the mailing as an in-state act “to effect” insurance on property then in Louisiana with an insurer not authorized under Louisiana law and sought \$3,000 in fines for three alleged violations.
- Allgeyer & Co. argued that applying the statute to this conduct deprived them of liberty and property without due process and denied equal protection, because the insurance contract was a lawful out-of-state contract beyond Louisiana’s regulatory reach.

## Issues

1. Whether applying Act No. 66 to fine a Louisiana firm for mailing notice to execute an insurance contract made and performed in New York deprives the firm of liberty and property without due process of law under the Fourteenth Amendment.
2. Whether Louisiana’s police power to regulate unqualified foreign insurers permits the state to forbid residents from taking otherwise lawful in-state steps necessary to perform a lawful out-of-state insurance contract.

## Decision

- The U.S. Supreme Court unanimously reversed the Louisiana Supreme Court’s affirmance of the fines.
- The Court held that, as applied to Allgeyer & Co.’s conduct, Act No. 66 violated the Fourteenth Amendment by depriving the defendants of liberty without due process of law.
- The Court distinguished prior precedent upholding state restrictions aimed at solicitation or procurement of insurance within the state on behalf of unlicensed insurers, concluding that this case involved performance of a contract already made outside the state.

## Legal Principles

- “Liberty” protected by the Fourteenth Amendment’s Due Process Clause includes the freedom to pursue a lawful calling and to enter into and carry out lawful contracts necessary to conduct that calling.
- A state may regulate the in-state business activities of foreign corporations, including conditions for doing business within the state, but it may not extend that authority to punish residents for carrying out lawful contracts made and to be performed in another state.
- Police-power justifications do not permit a state to bar otherwise lawful acts undertaken by residents solely to execute a valid out-of-state contract, where the practical effect is to prohibit the contract’s performance.

## Conclusion

The Court held that Louisiana could not, consistent with the Fourteenth Amendment, penalize a Louisiana firm for mailing notice required to perform a lawful marine insurance contract made and performed in New York, because such application impermissibly interfered with the constitutionally protected liberty to contract without due process of law.


Allgeyer v. Louisiana, 165 U.S. 578 (1897)