Antonissen v United Kingdom (Case C-292/89) [1991] ECR I-745

Facts

  • Ms. Antonissen, a Belgian national, entered the United Kingdom to seek employment.
  • After six months without finding work, she faced deportation by UK authorities.
  • The central question was whether a Member State may impose a time limit on a jobseeker’s right of residence if the person is still seeking work and can show genuine efforts to find employment.

Issues

  1. Whether Article 48 EEC (now Article 45 TFEU) grants jobseekers an unconditional right to reside in a Member State while seeking employment.
  2. Whether Member States may lawfully impose a time limit on jobseekers’ residence and require their departure if employment is not secured within that period.
  3. What factors must be considered in determining whether expulsion after a certain period is justified.

Decision

  • The ECJ held that Article 48 EEC does not confer an absolute right of residence for jobseekers.
  • Member States are permitted to impose a reasonable time limit on jobseekers’ residence for seeking work.
  • A jobseeker may be required to leave the Member State if employment has not been found within a reasonable timeframe.
  • However, the expulsion cannot be automatic after a fixed period; individual circumstances, efforts to find work, and genuine prospects must be considered.

Legal Principles

  • The right to free movement under Article 48 EEC/45 TFEU for jobseekers exists, but it is not unlimited in duration.
  • The notion of "reasonable time" for seeking work is relative and must consider individual circumstances.
  • Member States must assess the jobseeker's continuing efforts, prospects of success, and type of employment sought before requiring departure.
  • National measures must balance the fundamental free movement rights with the legitimate interests of Member States to regulate access to their labor market and social systems.
  • Subsequent case law (e.g. Lebon, Collins) and Directive 2004/38/EC have codified and expanded on these principles.

Conclusion

The ECJ in Antonissen established that Member States may require jobseekers to leave if they fail to find employment within a reasonable period, but they must fairly assess individual efforts and prospects, thereby balancing free movement rights with state regulatory interests.

The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising. This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.
No resources available.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of May 2025. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

All-in-one Learning Platform

Everything you need to master your assessments and job tests in one place

  • Comprehensive Content

    Access thousands of fully explained questions and cases across multiple subjects

  • Visual Learning

    Understand complex concepts with intuitive diagrams and flowcharts

  • Focused Practice

    Prepare for assessments with targeted practice materials and expert guidance

  • Personalized Learning

    Track your progress and focus on areas where you need improvement

  • Affordable Access

    Get quality educational resources at a fraction of traditional costs

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal