## Facts

- A young chimney sweep, referred to as A, found a jewel set in a ring.
- A took the jewel to a goldsmith, D, for valuation.
- While valuing the jewel, D’s apprentice removed the jewel from the setting and refused to return it to A.
- A did not have proof of absolute ownership, but possessed the jewel by having found it.
- The goldsmith, through his apprentice, withheld the jewel, resulting in a dispute over legal rights to possession.

## Issues

1. Whether the finder of a chattel (A) can claim possession against another (D) who subsequently takes the item.
2. Whether possessory title, gained by finding, is sufficient to maintain an action in conversion despite a lack of absolute ownership.
3. Whether the finder’s right to possession only yields to that of the true owner.

## Decision

- The Court of King's Bench held that A had a valid claim in conversion against D.
- The court affirmed that a finder of goods acquires a right to possession enforceable against all except the true owner.
- A’s possessory title was found superior to D’s, as D’s possession resulted from taking the chattel from A.
- Damages were awarded to A, based on the value of the jewel, upholding the possessory interest even though absolute ownership was not established.

## Legal Principles

- The tort of conversion protects possessory rights to personal property, not merely absolute ownership.
- A person with possession of a chattel may have a superior claim to all others except the true owner.
- Possessory title is sufficient to sustain an action in conversion.
- Section 8(1) of the Torts (Interference with Goods) Act 1977 clarifies that a defendant can defend a conversion claim by proving a third party has a better claim to the goods, highlighting the conditional nature of possessory rights.

## Conclusion

Armory v Delamirie established the legal principle that a finder of a chattel enjoys a possessory title enforceable against all except the true owner, enabling actions in conversion without requiring proof of absolute ownership; this remains a fundamental principle of English common law on personal property and conversion.


Armory v Delamirie (1722) 1 Str 505 (KB)