## Facts

- Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd sought a license from Wednesbury Corporation to open their cinema on Sundays.
- Wednesbury Corporation, as the local authority, granted the license with a condition prohibiting children under 15 from attending Sunday performances, regardless of whether they were accompanied by an adult.
- The claimant challenged the lawfulness of this condition, contending it was unreasonable.

## Issues

1. Whether Wednesbury Corporation had the legal power to attach such a condition to the Sunday cinema license.
2. Whether the imposed condition was so unreasonable that it was unlawful, thereby justifying judicial intervention.
3. What constitutes "unreasonableness" sufficient to invalidate an administrative decision.

## Decision

- The Court of Appeal held that the local authority had acted within its powers in imposing the condition forbidding children under 15 at Sunday performances.
- The court established that only a decision "so unreasonable that no reasonable authority could ever have come to it" would be subject to being overturned—a standard known as "Wednesbury unreasonableness."
- It was determined that mere disagreement with the reasonableness of a decision was insufficient for judicial review.

## Legal Principles

- Wednesbury unreasonableness is a ground for judicial review, requiring that a decision be irrational or absurd to the extreme that no reasonable authority could have made it.
- Courts are limited from substituting their own judgment for that of the administrative authority unless faced with a decision far outside the bounds of reasonableness.
- The doctrine has been illustrated in cases such as Short v Poole Corporation [1926] Ch 66 and Roberts v Hopwood [1925] AC 578, indicating its application to both hypothetical and actual administrative actions deemed absurd or financially reckless.
- Subsequent legal developments, including the concept of proportionality and the doctrine of substantive legitimate expectation, have refined and supplemented the Wednesbury standard, emphasizing fairness and a structured balance between individual rights and public interest.

## Conclusion

Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation set a significant benchmark in administrative law by establishing the narrow ground of Wednesbury unreasonableness for challenging administrative decisions, confining judicial review to cases of manifest irrationality and signaling ongoing development with related concepts such as proportionality and legitimate expectation.


Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation [1948] 1 KB 223