Automatic Self-Cleansing Filter Syndicate Co Ltd v Cuninghame [1906] 2 Ch 34

Facts

  • Automatic Self-Cleansing Filter Syndicate Co Ltd convened a general meeting where a resolution was passed instructing the directors to sell the company's assets.
  • The board of directors refused to comply, believing the sale would harm the company.
  • Shareholders contended that, as supreme authority, the general meeting could direct the board to act accordingly.
  • The dispute centered on whether the shareholders, by ordinary resolution, could override the directors’ authority granted under the articles of association.

Issues

  1. Whether the board of directors is obliged to follow a general meeting resolution directing specific management actions when the articles of association grant management powers to the directors.
  2. Whether the shareholders can override the directors’ powers through resolutions without amending the articles of association.
  3. Whether powers allocated to directors in the articles can be directly exercised by shareholders through a simple resolution.

Decision

  • The court held that the directors were not bound to follow the shareholder resolution instructing them to sell the company's assets.
  • It was reasoned that the articles of association vested the authority to manage the company’s business, including asset sales, in the directors.
  • The articles gave no provision for shareholders to directly intervene in management decisions unless the articles were amended.
  • As a result, unless expressly authorized by the articles, shareholders cannot by ordinary resolution direct the board on management matters.

Legal Principles

  • The articles of association determine the division of authority between the board and shareholders.
  • Directors have primary responsibility for managing the company's business as specified in the articles.
  • Shareholder powers are limited to amending the articles or removing directors if they wish to change management direction.
  • A shareholder resolution cannot override the board’s management powers unless such an override is permitted by the articles.
  • The legal separation of ownership (shareholders) and control (directors) is fundamental to company management.

Conclusion

The decision in Automatic Self-Cleansing Filter Syndicate Co Ltd v Cuninghame confirmed that, under a company's articles, the board retains exclusive authority over management decisions unless the articles expressly provide otherwise. Shareholders must use formal mechanisms, such as amending the articles or appointing new directors, to alter the division of power, reinforcing the primacy of the company's constitution in regulating internal governance.

The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising. This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.
No resources available.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of May 2025. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

All-in-one Learning Platform

Everything you need to master your assessments and job tests in one place

  • Comprehensive Content

    Access thousands of fully explained questions and cases across multiple subjects

  • Visual Learning

    Understand complex concepts with intuitive diagrams and flowcharts

  • Focused Practice

    Prepare for assessments with targeted practice materials and expert guidance

  • Personalized Learning

    Track your progress and focus on areas where you need improvement

  • Affordable Access

    Get quality educational resources at a fraction of traditional costs

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal