Barron v Potter, [1914] 1 Ch 895

Can You Answer This?

Practice with real exam questions

Zephyr Innovations Ltd has two remaining directors after the resignation of the third, leaving them deadlocked over a major business pivot. Ms. Lin, who owns the majority of the company’s shares, proposes appointing another director to break the tie. One existing director, Mr. Grant, insists that Ms. Lin cannot call a shareholders’ meeting without the board’s authorization. The company’s articles require two directors to form a valid board meeting, which is currently impossible due to persistent disagreement. Ms. Lin is concerned about the legal validity of her proposed actions to resolve the deadlock.


Which of the following is the single best statement about Ms. Lin’s rights in this situation?

Introduction

The rule set out in Barron v Potter [1914] 1 Ch 895 deals with the ongoing power of shareholders to act when a company’s board of directors cannot function. This case shows the limits of delegated power. When directors, who are responsible for running a company, have disputes that stop decisions, the shareholders’ meeting keeps the power to manage the company. This rule acts as a check on directors’ authority and supports the final say of shareholders in company law. Necessary conditions for this rule are a clear failure of the board to decide and a properly held shareholders’ meeting allowed to use these remaining powers.

The Deadlock in Barron v Potter

The events of Barron v Potter centered on a company with two directors, Mr. Barron and Mr. Potter, who were the only shareholders. Because of repeated disputes, they could not form a quorum for board decisions. Mr. Barron tried to call a shareholders’ meeting to add new directors and end the deadlock. Mr. Potter disagreed. The court ruled that Mr. Barron, as a shareholder, could lawfully call a meeting and appoint new directors since the board could not act.

Legal Basis for Shareholder Action

The court’s ruling in Barron v Potter is based on the idea that shareholders have the final say over a company. The board’s power comes from shareholders and works as their agents. When the board cannot act, shareholders, as the origin of power, retain the right to step in. This power comes from the company’s rules and basic agency ideas.

Comparing Barron v Potter to Usual Board Powers

The rule in Barron v Potter is not the same as everyday shareholder actions. Normally, shareholders use their power through meetings to choose directors, agree to major steps, or change company rules. Barron v Potter applies only when usual management fails. Shareholder action here is a last step when the board cannot work.

Use and Limits of the Rule

The rule from Barron v Potter has been used in later cases with similar deadlocks. However, it is restricted to cases where the board truly cannot act. Shareholders must follow company rules and legal standards. It does not let shareholders ignore the board in normal situations.

Impact on Company Management

Barron v Potter shows why clear ways to settle board disputes matter. Well-written company rules can have steps to fix deadlocks, like tie-breakers, outside help, or adding more directors. These steps might prevent the need for shareholder action, keeping management steady.

Conclusion

Barron v Potter stays an important case in company law, showing shareholders’ remaining power when the board cannot act. The rule protects against management failures, letting the company continue despite deadlocks. It confirms shareholders’ final control as owners and the board’s role as agents. The rule works only when the board is stuck but offers a legal backup to guard shareholders and keep the company running. The case also shows why writing company rules to lower deadlock risks matters, aiding smooth management. This ruling explains the limits of delegated power and the lasting role of shareholder oversight.

The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising. This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.

Related Posts

Explore more resources to support your job and test preparation

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of December 2024. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

Practice. Learn. Excel.

Features designed to support your job and test preparation

Question Bank

Access 100,000+ questions that adapt to your performance level and learning style.

Performance Analytics

Track your progress across topics and identify knowledge gaps with comprehensive analytics and insights.

Multi-Assessment Support

Prepare for multiple exams simultaneously, from academic tests to professional certifications.

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal