Bhullar v Bhullar [2003] EWCA Civ 424

Facts

  • The case concerned a family-run company operating grocery stores which owned a commercial property, part of which was leased to a tenant.
  • The tenant used a portion of adjacent land as a car park.
  • One of the company's directors noticed a "for sale" sign on the adjacent land.
  • Without informing the company or fellow directors, the director arranged for a separate company he controlled to purchase the adjacent land.
  • No disclosure was made to the company’s board regarding the opportunity to acquire the property.
  • The acquisition was later challenged in court, focusing on whether the director breached his fiduciary duty by not presenting the opportunity to the company, and questioning if the opportunity was within the company’s business interests.

Issues

  1. Whether the director’s acquisition of the adjacent property, without informing the company or its board, constituted a breach of fiduciary duty.
  2. Whether the corporate opportunity doctrine applied to these circumstances, making the property a matter the company was entitled to consider.
  3. Whether the director’s silence and personal acquisition via a separate entity deprived the company of its right to pursue the opportunity.

Decision

  • The court held that the adjacent land was a corporate opportunity directly relevant to the company’s interests.
  • By not communicating the opportunity and acquiring the property for himself, the director breached his fiduciary duty to avoid conflicts of interest.
  • The director's actions amounted to a violation of the corporate opportunity doctrine, as his duty required disclosure of opportunities falling within the company’s interests.
  • The director was found liable to account to the company for profits made through the acquisition of the property.
  • The ruling confirmed that using a separate controlled entity does not negate a director’s duty to the company.

Legal Principles

  • The corporate opportunity doctrine prevents directors from exploiting opportunities suitable for the company for their own benefit.
  • Directors have a fiduciary duty to avoid conflicts of interest and must disclose potentially worthwhile opportunities to the company.
  • This duty of disclosure arises even if the company may ultimately decide not to pursue the opportunity.
  • The doctrine applies where there is a connection between the opportunity and the company’s actual or potential business activities.
  • Directors cannot circumvent their fiduciary obligations by using other companies or individuals to secure such opportunities.

Conclusion

The Court of Appeal in Bhullar v Bhullar established that directors must not appropriate opportunities relevant to the company’s business for themselves and are strictly required to disclose such opportunities, reinforcing the high standard of fiduciary responsibility in corporate governance.

The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising. This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.
No resources available.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of May 2025. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

All-in-one Learning Platform

Everything you need to master your assessments and job tests in one place

  • Comprehensive Content

    Access thousands of fully explained questions and cases across multiple subjects

  • Visual Learning

    Understand complex concepts with intuitive diagrams and flowcharts

  • Focused Practice

    Prepare for assessments with targeted practice materials and expert guidance

  • Personalized Learning

    Track your progress and focus on areas where you need improvement

  • Affordable Access

    Get quality educational resources at a fraction of traditional costs

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal