B. & F. Aero v Blackpool Council, 3 All ER 25

Can You Answer This?

Practice with real exam questions

Hillside Council issued a public invitation to tender for an art installation in a newly developed community park. The invitation stated that all bids submitted by email before the specified deadline would be reviewed in full. Vibrant Creations Ltd, a well-known art collective, sent its complete proposal two days ahead of the deadline. However, due to a technical fault in the council’s email server, the proposal never reached the official’s inbox. Unaware of the loss, the council awarded the contract to another bidder, prompting Vibrant Creations Ltd to argue that their properly submitted bid was wrongfully ignored.


Which of the following statements best reflects how the principle from Blackpool & Fylde Aero Club Ltd v Blackpool Borough Council [1990] 3 All ER 25 applies to this scenario?

Introduction

The rule of fairness in public procurement processes means all bids submitted following the stated rules must be fully reviewed. This basic rule comes from the common law duty of fairness and applies even if an invitation to tender (ITT) clearly says the authority does not have to accept the lowest or any bid. The legal rules for bidding processes focus on openness and equal treatment, requiring authorities to act honestly and without bias. Main requirements for a valid bid include meeting deadlines, giving all needed information, and matching the set criteria. Not reviewing a valid bid may lead to claims for breaking this duty.

The Facts of Blackpool & Fylde Aero Club

The Blackpool & Fylde Aero Club had operated pleasure flights from Blackpool Airport for years under licenses from Blackpool Borough Council. When the license ended, the Council asked for bids for a new license. The Aero Club sent a bid that met all requirements. However, due to an administrative error, their bid was not reviewed. The Council awarded the license to another group.

The Court of Appeal's Decision

The Court of Appeal found the Council broke its duty to review all valid bids. Lord Justice Bingham said the invitation to tender created a legal duty to check all bids sent through the correct process. While the Council kept the right to pick the best bid or reject all bids, this choice did not let them ignore properly submitted bids. The error in handling the Aero Club’s bid made the process unfair.

Effects on Public Procurement

The Blackpool & Fylde Aero Club case set a central rule in public procurement law. It confirmed the duty to review all valid bids exists even if the ITT states the authority does not have to accept any bid. This supports the need for openness and equal treatment for all bidders. The case also showed the importance of reliable administrative steps to avoid mistakes that leave out valid bids.

The Duty of Fairness and Honesty

This case stresses the wider rule of fairness and honesty in contractual dealings, especially in public procurement. Courts will check public authorities’ actions to ensure they meet these standards. Authorities must review bids fairly and without bias. Signs of unfair treatment or favor may lead to legal challenges.

Practical Advice for Bidding

Groups involved in bidding should carefully study ITT documents and follow all instructions exactly. Keeping clear records of all communications and submissions is important. If questions arise about fairness in the process, getting legal advice quickly can help protect rights. Knowing the result of Blackpool & Fylde Aero Club helps bidders ensure their bids are reviewed properly.

Differences from Other Cases

The Blackpool & Fylde decision is not the same as cases where authorities clearly keep the right to ignore bids based on set terms. For example, if an ITT says bids over a certain cost will be rejected, the authority may dismiss those bids. The main difference is that in Blackpool & Fylde, the Aero Club’s bid was missed due to an error, not because it failed to meet criteria. The case focuses on fair process rather than bid content.

The Role of Administrative Steps

Blackpool & Fylde Aero Club shows the key role of clear and effective administrative steps in public procurement. Setting up reliable systems for receiving, tracking, and reviewing bids lowers the chance of errors that could result in legal claims. These systems should include checks to confirm all valid bids are reviewed. Recording each step of the process helps show compliance with fairness duties.

Conclusion

The Blackpool & Fylde Aero Club Ltd v Blackpool Borough Council case stays a key example in UK public procurement law. It confirms the implied duty of authorities to review all properly submitted bids, even if the ITT states they do not have to accept any bid. This rule, based on fairness and honesty in contracts, protects bidders and supports the fairness of public procurement. The case also highlights the need for effective administrative practices to prevent errors that harm fairness. The judgment gives clear guidance for authorities and bidders, supporting open and equal procurement processes. Similar cases like R v Lancashire County Council, ex parte Hudspeth [1986] 85 LGR 400 give more details on local authorities’ procurement duties. The rules from Blackpool & Fylde continue to shape public procurement law, setting clear expectations for fair and open awarding of public contracts.

The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising. This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.

Related Posts

Explore more resources to support your job and test preparation

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of December 2024. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

Practice. Learn. Excel.

Features designed to support your job and test preparation

Question Bank

Access 100,000+ questions that adapt to your performance level and learning style.

Performance Analytics

Track your progress across topics and identify knowledge gaps with comprehensive analytics and insights.

Multi-Assessment Support

Prepare for multiple exams simultaneously, from academic tests to professional certifications.

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal