Bowman v Secular Society Ltd [1917] AC 406 (HL)

Facts

  • Bowman v Secular Society Ltd [1917] AC 406 concerned the registration of a society whose objects included supporting free thought and challenging religious dogma.
  • Certain elements of the society's aims, particularly those critical of Christianity, were argued to be against public policy, prompting legal challenges to registration.
  • The case required the House of Lords to assess whether the society’s objects, as stated in its objects clause, violated legal standards or merely expressed unpopular or controversial views.
  • The society sought registration as a legitimate organization despite opposition to its objects.

Issues

  1. Whether the society’s stated objects, which challenged religious orthodoxy, rendered its registration unlawful on grounds of public policy.
  2. Whether the expression of unpopular or unconventional views in an objects clause constitutes unlawful activity or is protected under the law.
  3. What the proper judicial approach is to interpreting objects clauses when considering the legality of a society’s aims.

Decision

  • The House of Lords held that, although the society’s aims were controversial and possibly offensive to some, registration could not be refused unless the objectives directly encouraged illegal acts or contravened the law.
  • The court distinguished between expressing dissenting or unpopular opinions and inciting unlawful activities, affirming that only the latter justified legal constraint.
  • Judicial assessment of objects clauses focuses on legality, not the popularity or morality of the aims.
  • The judgment highlighted that freedom of association is protected unless there is a direct link between the society’s stated objectives and unlawful acts.

Legal Principles

  • The legality of a society’s registration depends on whether its stated objects advance or encourage conduct contrary to law, not merely because they challenge popular or religious beliefs.
  • Courts should refrain from assessing the morality or desirability of a society’s aims, focusing strictly on whether the objects clause sets out legal purposes.
  • Freedom of association encompasses the right to advocate for legal change and hold dissenting opinions so long as such advocacy does not amount to incitement to illegality.
  • Drafting clear and unambiguous objects clauses is essential to avoiding legal challenges to a society’s legitimacy and registration.

Conclusion

The decision in Bowman v Secular Society Ltd [1917] AC 406 established that societies may lawfully register even if their aims are controversial or challenge prevailing norms, provided there is no encouragement of illegal activity. The judgment set a lasting precedent affirming the boundaries of freedom of association in the context of society registration and the interpretation of objects clauses.

The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising. This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.
No resources available.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of May 2025. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

All-in-one Learning Platform

Everything you need to master your assessments and job tests in one place

  • Comprehensive Content

    Access thousands of fully explained questions and cases across multiple subjects

  • Visual Learning

    Understand complex concepts with intuitive diagrams and flowcharts

  • Focused Practice

    Prepare for assessments with targeted practice materials and expert guidance

  • Personalized Learning

    Track your progress and focus on areas where you need improvement

  • Affordable Access

    Get quality educational resources at a fraction of traditional costs

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal