## Facts

- Bowman v Secular Society Ltd [1917] AC 406 concerned the registration of a society whose objects included supporting free thought and challenging religious dogma.
- Certain elements of the society's aims, particularly those critical of Christianity, were argued to be against public policy, prompting legal challenges to registration.
- The case required the House of Lords to assess whether the society’s objects, as stated in its objects clause, violated legal standards or merely expressed unpopular or controversial views.
- The society sought registration as a legitimate organization despite opposition to its objects.

## Issues

1. Whether the society’s stated objects, which challenged religious orthodoxy, rendered its registration unlawful on grounds of public policy.
2. Whether the expression of unpopular or unconventional views in an objects clause constitutes unlawful activity or is protected under the law.
3. What the proper judicial approach is to interpreting objects clauses when considering the legality of a society’s aims.

## Decision

- The House of Lords held that, although the society’s aims were controversial and possibly offensive to some, registration could not be refused unless the objectives directly encouraged illegal acts or contravened the law.
- The court distinguished between expressing dissenting or unpopular opinions and inciting unlawful activities, affirming that only the latter justified legal constraint.
- Judicial assessment of objects clauses focuses on legality, not the popularity or morality of the aims.
- The judgment highlighted that freedom of association is protected unless there is a direct link between the society’s stated objectives and unlawful acts.

## Legal Principles

- The legality of a society’s registration depends on whether its stated objects advance or encourage conduct contrary to law, not merely because they challenge popular or religious beliefs.
- Courts should refrain from assessing the morality or desirability of a society’s aims, focusing strictly on whether the objects clause sets out legal purposes.
- Freedom of association encompasses the right to advocate for legal change and hold dissenting opinions so long as such advocacy does not amount to incitement to illegality.
- Drafting clear and unambiguous objects clauses is essential to avoiding legal challenges to a society’s legitimacy and registration.

## Conclusion

The decision in Bowman v Secular Society Ltd [1917] AC 406 established that societies may lawfully register even if their aims are controversial or challenge prevailing norms, provided there is no encouragement of illegal activity. The judgment set a lasting precedent affirming the boundaries of freedom of association in the context of society registration and the interpretation of objects clauses.


Bowman v Secular Society Ltd [1917] AC 406 (HL)