Bristol & West Building Society v Ellis (1996) 73 P&CR 158

Facts

  • Bristol & West Building Society provided a mortgage loan to Mrs. Ellis, secured against her home.
  • Mrs. Ellis defaulted on her mortgage payments due to financial difficulties.
  • The lender initiated possession proceedings following the default.
  • Mrs. Ellis argued at trial that her financial hardship should prevent the lender from obtaining possession, as she lacked a realistic prospect of repaying the arrears.
  • The trial court granted possession; Mrs. Ellis appealed, contending the court should use its discretion to delay or refuse possession.
  • The Court of Appeal dismissed Mrs. Ellis’s appeal and upheld the possession order.

Issues

  1. Whether financial hardship alone is a sufficient ground to refuse a lender’s claim for possession when a borrower defaults on mortgage payments.
  2. What is the extent of the court's discretion to delay possession under the Administration of Justice Acts 1970 and 1973.
  3. Whether the interests of contractual certainty outweigh considerations of borrower hardship in possession proceedings.

Decision

  • The Court of Appeal held that financial hardship on the part of the borrower is not, by itself, enough to prevent a lender from obtaining possession after default.
  • The court reaffirmed that statutory discretion to delay possession is available only where the borrower can show a reasonable prospect of repaying arrears within a defined period.
  • Since Mrs. Ellis lacked the ability to repay the arrears within a reasonable period, the possession order was upheld.
  • The court emphasized the primacy of the lender’s contractual right to possession, subject only to the limited statutory discretion provided by legislation.

Legal Principles

  • Lenders have a prima facie contractual and statutory right to possession upon borrower default.
  • The court’s discretion to delay or suspend possession orders is limited by statute and only applies if the borrower can realistically repay arrears within a reasonable timeframe.
  • Financial hardship, without more, does not override the lender’s right to possession.
  • The decision reinforces the need for contractual certainty in mortgage transactions.
  • Procedural fairness in possession proceedings is mandated, ensuring both parties have an opportunity to be heard.

Conclusion

The Court of Appeal confirmed that financial hardship alone does not preclude a lender from obtaining possession of a mortgaged property upon default, and statutory discretion to delay possession is tightly constrained. Contractual rights of lenders remain primary, with limited scope for equitable relief except where repayment of arrears within a reasonable period is demonstrated.

The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising. This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.
No resources available.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of May 2025. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

All-in-one Learning Platform

Everything you need to master your assessments and job tests in one place

  • Comprehensive Content

    Access thousands of fully explained questions and cases across multiple subjects

  • Visual Learning

    Understand complex concepts with intuitive diagrams and flowcharts

  • Focused Practice

    Prepare for assessments with targeted practice materials and expert guidance

  • Personalized Learning

    Track your progress and focus on areas where you need improvement

  • Affordable Access

    Get quality educational resources at a fraction of traditional costs

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal