Bristol & West Building Society v Henning [1985] 2 All ER 606

Facts

  • Mr. and Mrs. Henning, a married couple, jointly purchased a property, but the legal title was registered solely in Mr. Henning’s name.
  • Mrs. Henning contributed to the purchase price and lived at the property.
  • Mr. Henning obtained a mortgage from Bristol and West Building Society without informing Mrs. Henning.
  • Upon Mr. Henning’s default, the building society sought possession of the property.
  • Mrs. Henning claimed an overriding interest pursuant to section 70(1)(g) of the Land Registration Act 1925, asserting that her actual occupation bound the building society.
  • The building society argued it had no notice of Mrs. Henning’s interest and that she had given implied consent to the mortgage.

Issues

  1. Whether Mrs. Henning’s actual occupation established an overriding interest under section 70(1)(g) of the Land Registration Act 1925.
  2. Whether Mrs. Henning’s conduct amounted to implied consent to the mortgage, thereby defeating her claim to an overriding interest.
  3. Whether the building society was bound by Mrs. Henning’s rights in the absence of constructive notice.

Decision

  • The Court of Appeal held that Mrs. Henning’s implied consent to the mortgage defeated her overriding interest claim.
  • The court determined that Mrs. Henning’s conduct, including signing documents related to the mortgage, constituted implied consent.
  • As a result, the building society was not bound by her interest under section 70(1)(g).
  • The doctrine of constructive notice did not apply, as the building society had made reasonable inquiries and acted in good faith without notice of Mrs. Henning's interest.

Legal Principles

  • Actual occupation may give rise to an overriding interest under section 70(1)(g) of the Land Registration Act 1925.
  • Implied consent, inferred from conduct such as signing relevant documents, can defeat a claim to an overriding interest.
  • Constructive notice requires that mortgagees make reasonable inquiries to discover occupiers with potential interests in the property.
  • Where a mortgagee acts in good faith and without notice of the occupier’s rights, and the occupier has given implied consent, no overriding interest will bind the mortgagee.

Conclusion

The decision in Bristol & West BS v Henning established that an occupier’s implied consent to a mortgage transaction can prevent the assertion of an overriding interest, provided the mortgagee acts in good faith and without notice of the claim, thereby clarifying the application of constructive notice and the protection of occupiers under the Land Registration Act 1925.

The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising. This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.
No resources available.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of May 2025. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

All-in-one Learning Platform

Everything you need to master your assessments and job tests in one place

  • Comprehensive Content

    Access thousands of fully explained questions and cases across multiple subjects

  • Visual Learning

    Understand complex concepts with intuitive diagrams and flowcharts

  • Focused Practice

    Prepare for assessments with targeted practice materials and expert guidance

  • Personalized Learning

    Track your progress and focus on areas where you need improvement

  • Affordable Access

    Get quality educational resources at a fraction of traditional costs

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal