Brudenell-Bruce v Moore [2014] EWHC 3679 (Ch)

Facts

  • The case concerned the management of a trust established for the benefit of the claimant, Lord Cardigan.
  • Mr. Moore was appointed as trustee and responsible for overseeing trust assets, including a substantial estate.
  • The claimant alleged the trustee failed to maintain the estate, neglected necessary repairs, failed to secure appropriate insurance, and made poor investment decisions.
  • Such acts were claimed to constitute breaches of fiduciary duties, causing significant financial losses to the trust.
  • The court assessed the trustee’s actions regarding trust administration and their impact on the estate’s value.

Issues

  1. Whether the defendant’s conduct amounted to a breach of fiduciary duty in the administration of the trust.
  2. Whether the claimant's losses were directly attributable to the alleged mismanagement by the trustee.
  3. How equitable compensation should be assessed for losses resulting from the breach.
  4. Whether there was any contributory negligence by the claimant affecting liability or the quantum of compensation.

Decision

  • The court found that the defendant failed to maintain the estate and make prudent investment decisions, constituting a breach of fiduciary duty.
  • The defendant’s conduct did not meet the standard of care required of trustees managing trust assets.
  • The court determined that the claimant’s losses, including the decline in estate value and lost income, were directly attributable to the defendant’s mismanagement.
  • No contributory negligence by the claimant was found.
  • The court awarded equitable compensation based on the estimated costs to restore the estate and the lost income resulting from the breach.

Legal Principles

  • Trustees owe fiduciary duties including the duty to act in good faith, loyalty, and to exercise reasonable care and skill.
  • Trustees must act in the best interests of beneficiaries and preserve the value of trust assets.
  • Equitable compensation restores beneficiaries to the position they would have been in but for the breach.
  • The causal connection between breach and loss is essential in awarding equitable compensation.
  • Equitable compensation is compensatory, not punitive, and must reflect actual financial loss.

Conclusion

The court held the trustee liable for breaches of fiduciary duty and awarded equitable compensation to the claimant for losses caused by mismanagement, reinforcing trustee obligations to act diligently and in beneficiaries’ best interests.

The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising. This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.
No resources available.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of May 2025. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

All-in-one Learning Platform

Everything you need to master your assessments and job tests in one place

  • Comprehensive Content

    Access thousands of fully explained questions and cases across multiple subjects

  • Visual Learning

    Understand complex concepts with intuitive diagrams and flowcharts

  • Focused Practice

    Prepare for assessments with targeted practice materials and expert guidance

  • Personalized Learning

    Track your progress and focus on areas where you need improvement

  • Affordable Access

    Get quality educational resources at a fraction of traditional costs

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal