Bull v Bull [1955] 1 QB 234 (CA)

Facts

  • The case involved a property purchased jointly by a mother and her son.
  • The son contributed more to the purchase price and the property’s legal title was registered solely in his name.
  • The mother contributed part of the purchase price and was permitted to reside in a portion of the property.
  • After a disagreement, the son attempted to evict his mother from the property.

Issues

  1. Whether the mother’s contribution to the purchase price granted her a beneficial interest in the property through a resulting trust, despite the son holding sole legal title.
  2. Whether the son was entitled to evict his mother or if her rights as a beneficiary of a resulting trust prevented this.
  3. How the presumption of advancement applies when assessing ownership between closely related parties who both contribute to a purchase.
  4. What practical steps can joint purchasers take to clarify their respective beneficial interests.

Decision

  • The Court of Appeal determined that the mother’s financial contribution created a resulting trust, granting her an equitable interest proportionate to her payment.
  • The son, although holding sole legal title, could not evict the mother because she retained beneficial ownership in the property.
  • The court clarified that equitable ownership under a resulting trust operates independently of the legal title.
  • The presumption of advancement could be rebutted if there was clear evidence of intent to share ownership according to contributions rather than intending a gift.

Legal Principles

  • A resulting trust arises when parties contribute towards the purchase price but legal title is held in one name, unless evidence shows a gift or loan was intended.
  • The presumption of advancement, which presumes a gift in certain close relationships, can be displaced by evidence indicating an intention to share beneficial ownership in proportion to contributions.
  • The decision confirmed that resulting trusts may apply between family members, not just between unrelated joint purchasers.
  • Written agreements and clear records of contributions are advisable to prevent disputes and to provide evidence of intended ownership shares, as later emphasized in cases like Stack v Dowden [2007] UKHL 17.
  • Earlier rulings, such as Dyer v Dyer (1788) 2 Cox Eq Cas 92, affirm that contributions towards purchase price are determinative of equitable interests.

Conclusion

The Court of Appeal's decision in Bull v Bull established that equitable ownership based on resulting trusts can arise from financial contributions to a property's purchase, even where only one party holds legal title. This ensures that beneficial interests reflect actual contributions unless contrary intention is proven, providing important guidance for joint ownership arrangements.

The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising. This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.
No resources available.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of May 2025. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

All-in-one Learning Platform

Everything you need to master your assessments and job tests in one place

  • Comprehensive Content

    Access thousands of fully explained questions and cases across multiple subjects

  • Visual Learning

    Understand complex concepts with intuitive diagrams and flowcharts

  • Focused Practice

    Prepare for assessments with targeted practice materials and expert guidance

  • Personalized Learning

    Track your progress and focus on areas where you need improvement

  • Affordable Access

    Get quality educational resources at a fraction of traditional costs

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal