Gebhard v Consiglio Ord. Milano, C-55/94

Can You Answer This?

Practice with real exam questions

Marta, a Dutch marketing consultant, recently began operating in Italy to help local businesses expand their brand reach. She has rented a small office space in Milan and signed a lease contract for an indefinite term. She advertises herself in Italy using an Italian trade name, hosting her own business signage. Although Marta occasionally travels back to the Netherlands for conferences, the majority of her clientele is now based in Milan. She plans to continue serving Italian clients indefinitely as her primary focus is building a stable network in the local market.


Which of the following is the best classification of Marta’s cross-border activities under EU law, based on the relevant test from Gebhard?

Introduction

The distinction between the freedom of establishment (Article 49 TFEU) and the freedom to provide services (Article 56 TFEU) is a fundamental principle within the framework of the European Union's internal market. These freedoms, while both aimed at enabling economic activity across Member States, operate under distinct legal regimes. Case C-55/94 Gebhard provides key criteria for differentiating these two concepts, focusing on the duration, regularity, periodicity, and continuity of the economic activity in question. Understanding these criteria is essential for determining the applicable EU law provisions and ensuring compliance within the internal market.

The Gebhard Case: A Summary

The Gebhard case concerned a German lawyer, Mr. Gebhard, who wished to practice law in Italy. He established a 'chambers' in Italy and described himself as an avvocato, a protected professional title in Italy. The Italian Bar Council challenged his right to do so. The European Court of Justice (ECJ) was asked to clarify whether Mr. Gebhard's activities fell under the freedom of establishment or the freedom to provide services.

The Court's Ruling on Establishment

The ECJ held that Mr. Gebhard's activities constituted establishment rather than the provision of services. The Court defined establishment as the pursuit of an economic activity through a fixed establishment in another Member State for an indefinite period. This involves a stable and continuous presence within the host Member State's market. Mr. Gebhard's establishment of a chambers and his intention to practice law in Italy indefinitely satisfied these conditions.

Defining the Freedom to Provide Services

Conversely, the Court characterized the freedom to provide services as the temporary provision of services in another Member State, without a permanent physical presence. Key indicators of a service provision are its temporary nature, linked to the duration of the service, even if the service provider may need some form of infrastructure in the host Member State. This temporary nature relates to the duration, regularity, periodicity, or continuity of the provision.

The Gebhard Test: Duration, Regularity, Periodicity, and Continuity

The Gebhard case established a four-pronged test for differentiating establishment from services. These criteria, which must be considered collectively, are:

  • Duration: The length of time the economic activity is carried out in the host Member State. A longer duration suggests establishment.
  • Regularity: The frequency and consistency with which the activity is performed. Regular activities point towards establishment.
  • Periodicity: Whether the activity occurs in recurring cycles or intervals. Predictable recurrence suggests establishment.
  • Continuity: The uninterrupted or sustained nature of the economic activity. A continuous presence signifies establishment.

Applying the Gebhard Test: Examples

The Gebhard test can be applied to various scenarios. Consider a consultant who travels to another Member State for a single project lasting three months. This likely constitutes a service provision due to its limited duration. However, if the consultant establishes an office in the host Member State and secures ongoing contracts with local clients, this suggests establishment. Similarly, a construction company undertaking a single project within a Member State over several years provides a service, whereas opening a permanent branch in that Member State to undertake various projects indefinitely represents establishment.

Implications for National Regulation

The distinction between establishment and services has significant implications for national regulation. Member States retain greater regulatory competence concerning establishment, as it involves a more enduring participation in their economies. This allows them to impose requirements related to professional qualifications, registration, and other aspects of market access. However, regulations affecting service providers are subject to stricter scrutiny under EU law to ensure they do not unduly restrict cross-border activities.

Subsequent Case Law and Refinements

The principles established in Gebhard have been further developed and refined in subsequent ECJ case law. Cases like Alpine Investments (C-384/93) concerning outbound services and Centros (C-212/97) regarding the right to establish a company in one Member State and operate from another have further clarified the details of these freedoms. The ECJ continues to emphasize the importance of avoiding overly restrictive interpretations of these fundamental principles to ensure the proper functioning of the internal market.

Conclusion

The Gebhard case provides a key framework for understanding the distinction between the freedom of establishment and the freedom to provide services within the EU's internal market. The four criteria—duration, regularity, periodicity, and continuity—form the basis of this analysis. While subsequent case law has added further detail, the Gebhard principles remain fundamental. Accurate application of these criteria is essential for businesses and professionals operating across borders, enabling them to determine the applicable legal regime and ensure compliance with EU law. Understanding this distinction allows for the effective exercise of these freedoms, contributing to the seamless operation of the internal market and the support of cross-border economic activity. The principles established in Gebhard, along with subsequent jurisprudence, offer a solid framework for analyzing the complex interplay between these freedoms and national regulations, ensuring the continued development of a dynamic and integrated European economy.

The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising. This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of December 2024. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

Practice. Learn. Excel.

Features designed to support your job and test preparation

Question Bank

Access 100,000+ questions that adapt to your performance level and learning style.

Performance Analytics

Track your progress across topics and identify knowledge gaps with comprehensive analytics and insights.

Multi-Assessment Support

Prepare for multiple exams simultaneously, from academic tests to professional certifications.

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal