Rebalancing and overlays - Calendar vs threshold rebalancing

Learning Outcomes

After completing this article, you should be able to explain and compare calendar and threshold rebalancing approaches, identify their practical advantages/limitations, and describe the role of overlays in institutional portfolio management. You will understand key risks, implementation issues, and best practices for rebalancing strategies assessed in CFA Level 3 exams.

CFA Level 3 Syllabus

For CFA Level 3, you are required to understand portfolio rebalancing techniques and overlays, focusing on the following areas:

• Explain and compare calendar-based and threshold-based (range) rebalancing approaches
• Articulate how overlays (e.g., derivatives) can be used to adjust exposures and facilitate rebalancing
• Assess trade-offs between different rebalancing policies with regard to risk, cost, and diversification benefits
• Describe key implementation issues and best practices for institutional portfolios

Test Your Knowledge

Attempt these questions before reading this article. If you find some difficult or cannot remember the answers, remember to look more closely at that area during your revision.

1. Which type of rebalancing—calendar or threshold—is more responsive to changing market volatility and why?
2. State one main advantage and one key disadvantage of using threshold-based rebalancing in an illiquid portfolio.
3. Explain the term "overlay" in portfolio management and outline one practical use.
4. What is a typical operational challenge when implementing overlay rebalancing using derivatives?

Introduction

Rebalancing brings portfolios back to target weights as asset prices change or cash flows occur, maintaining alignment with investment policy and risk budgets. Two common approaches are calendar rebalancing (rebalance at set intervals regardless of drift) and threshold (range) rebalancing (rebalance only if weights move beyond set bands). Portfolio overlays—often using derivatives—can also adjust exposures or implement rebalancing efficiently. CFA candidates must understand the operation, benefits, and limitations of each approach and their application across institutional portfolios.

Key Term: rebalancing
The process of adjusting a portfolio’s asset class or factor exposures back to target allocations as market values change.

CALENDAR-BASED REBALANCING

Calendar-based (periodic) rebalancing means returning a portfolio to its target weights on a fixed schedule, such as monthly, quarterly, or annually. No regard is given to the extent of drift between scheduled dates; only the passage of time triggers trades.

Key Term: calendar rebalancing
Rebalancing executed at regular, predefined intervals, regardless of the amount of drift from target allocations.

Strengths

• Simple, requiring minimal monitoring
• Predictable—facilitates operational planning and reporting
• Lower ongoing monitoring/resource needs

Weaknesses

• May allow risk exposures to drift far from target between rebalance dates
• Can result in unnecessary turnover/costs if the portfolio remains within desired range
• Less responsive to increased volatility or major market shocks

Worked Example 1.1

A pension fund uses annual rebalancing. In a year of market turmoil, equities appreciate dramatically and reach 75% of portfolio value (vs. a 60% target) just two months after the last rebalance. What is the risk consequence?

Answer:
The portfolio will remain over-exposed to equities and under-allocated to other assets for 10 months, increasing tracking error relative to policy, exposing the fund to unintended risk, and potentially departing from policy objectives.

THRESHOLD-BASED REBALANCING

Threshold (range or tolerance band) rebalancing monitors actual asset weights and triggers trades only when an asset class moves outside pre-set allowable bounds (e.g., +/- 5% around target). The portfolio is rebalanced only when a limit is breached, rather than on a routine schedule.

Key Term: threshold rebalancing
Rebalancing triggered when an asset class or factor allocation moves outside a specified range, relative to its target allocation.

Strengths (Threshold-Based)

• More risk-controlled: addresses dangerous deviations faster, especially during high volatility
• May lower trading costs and turnover when assets remain within bands
• Efficient for portfolios subject to large or random cash flows

Weaknesses (Threshold-Based)

• Requires frequent monitoring and greater operational complexity
• Rebalance timing is less predictable
• Potentially many small trades if volatility is high

Setting Tolerance Bands

Typical ranges are fixed (e.g., ±5%) or proportional (e.g., ±20% of target). Often, riskier or less liquid assets are assigned wider bands to minimize transaction costs.

Worked Example 1.2

An endowment's policy allocates 40% to bonds (range: 36–44%). After a market rally, bonds fall to 35.8% of portfolio. What happens?

Answer:
The breach of the lower tolerance triggers a rebalancing trade, which will restore bonds to target, selling outperforming assets and buying bonds. If no breach occurred, no trade would be made.

Exam Warning

If asked to compare rebalancing approaches, do not confuse frequency (calendar) with sensitivity (threshold)—the methods serve different control purposes.

REBALANCING WITH OVERLAYS

Rebalancing overlays typically use derivatives (e.g., futures, swaps) to synthetically adjust asset exposures without direct trading in the physical securities. Overlays are common when physical trading is costly, impractical, or would disrupt implementation across sub-portfolios or complex structures.

Key Term: overlay
A position—often using derivatives—added to a portfolio to efficiently alter asset, currency, or risk factor exposures, especially for rebalancing.

Key Term: synthetic rebalancing
Changing the effective portfolio exposures using derivatives, not direct trading in the physical assets.

Typical Uses

• Temporary adjustment to exposures pending physical rebalancing
• Handling large cash inflows/outflows prior to full investment (“equitization”)
• Efficiently rebalancing illiquid portfolios or across multiple managers

Worked Example 1.3

A large sovereign wealth fund wishes to rebalance from domestic equities into global equities. Trading the physical stocks would take weeks. What overlay approach is used?

Answer:
The fund can sell domestic equity futures and buy global equity index futures in desired proportions, quickly matching exposure to policy targets. Later, physical trades can be completed if necessary.

Implementation Considerations

• Margin and collateral requirements for derivatives
• Overlays may introduce basis risk if derivatives do not perfectly match asset exposures
• The timing and cost of rolling contracts must be planned
• Policies should define when overlays are permitted and the risk limits applied

COMPARING CALENDAR VS THRESHOLD REBALANCING

Key Point Checklist

This article has covered the following key knowledge points:

• Recognize that calendar and threshold rebalancing are the main techniques to bring portfolios back to target weights
• Identify that calendar rebalancing is simple and predictable but can allow exposures to drift significantly between scheduled dates
• Explain that threshold (range-based) rebalancing ensures risk is controlled more tightly but needs ongoing monitoring and adds complexity
• Describe overlays as a synthetic tool—using derivatives—to facilitate efficient exposure adjustments and rebalancing
• Appreciate that overlay rebalancing is efficient in illiquid, multi-manager, and large portfolios, but requires robust derivative management and risk policies

Key Terms and Concepts

• rebalancing
• calendar rebalancing
• threshold rebalancing
• overlay
• synthetic rebalancing