Common Law Rights v. Formal Laws

Can You Answer This?

Practice with real exam questions

A local journalist, Ms. Rivers, writes an exposé criticizing the decision of a small town council to impose a mandatory pre-approval requirement on all political letters to the editor in the local newspaper. The council claims it has the inherent authority to protect community cohesion, but it references no clear statutory power. Ms. Rivers challenges the policy in court, asserting it burdens her freedom of expression without adequate legal grounding. She cites historical precedents in UK common law that guard editorial independence from arbitrary government intrusion. The council responds that since no specific domestic statute or human rights convention addresses this scenario, their measure is presumptively valid.


Which of the following is the best explanation for how a court might evaluate this policy under common law fundamental rights?

Introduction

Common law fundamental rights are rules that protect personal freedoms, rooted not in written laws or international agreements but in court decisions and England’s established legal history. These rights come from courts’ core duty to uphold protections seen as needed for a fair society. To establish such rights, one must show their historical basis in legal tradition and their ongoing relevance to modern values. This text outlines the history, central ideas, and practical use of common law fundamental rights.

The History of Common Law Rights

The origins of common law rights trace back to Magna Carta (1215), which, while not outlining current individual protections, limited royal power and acknowledged certain freedoms. Later steps, including the Petition of Right (1628) and the Habeas Corpus Act (1679), broadened protections against arbitrary government acts. Judicial review in cases like Entick v Carrington (1765) confirmed courts’ authority to block state actions breaking legal standards, indirectly supporting basic rights.

Central Ideas Behind Common Law Rights

Basic principles support common law rights. The principle of legality requires clear legal grounds for state actions. The presumption of liberty lets individuals act freely unless laws explicitly forbid it. Fair process rules, like the right to a fair hearing and impartial decisions, ensure justice in legal matters. These ideas restrict state power and help shape common law rights.

Common Law Rights in Practice: Case Examples

Malone v Metropolitan Police Commissioner (1979) shows common law rights protecting privacy. Courts acknowledged a right to private communication without relying on specific laws. In R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Simms (1999), free speech was upheld when the House of Lords ruled restrictions on prisoners’ contact with journalists unlawful. These rulings show how common law adjusts to societal changes and protects rights without legislation.

Common Law Rights and the Human Rights Act 1998

The Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA), which included the European Convention on Human Rights into UK law, changed rights enforcement. While the HRA provides a formal process to claim Convention rights, it does not replace common law rights. Courts often use common law ideas when handling Convention rights, recognizing their shared roles. Discussions suggest common law rights could remain as protections if the UK leaves the European Convention.

The Current Role of Common Law Rights

Despite the HRA’s impact, common law rights stay important. They offer flexible ways to protect freedoms in areas outside the Convention’s scope and reflect a UK-centered approach tied to the nation’s legal history. Their continued use confirms their role in defending individual liberties.

Conclusion

Common law fundamental rights remain essential to the UK’s constitutional system. From Magna Carta to modern privacy and free speech rulings, these rights show a lasting commitment to legal protections. The relationship between common law rights and the HRA creates a strong system that secures freedoms through both laws and court decisions. Cases like Malone and Simms demonstrate practical applications and responses to new challenges. The ongoing growth of common law rights ensures their place in supporting justice and democratic principles.

The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising. This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.

Related Posts

Explore more resources to support your job and test preparation

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of December 2024. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

Practice. Learn. Excel.

Features designed to support your job and test preparation

Question Bank

Access 100,000+ questions that adapt to your performance level and learning style.

Performance Analytics

Track your progress across topics and identify knowledge gaps with comprehensive analytics and insights.

Multi-Assessment Support

Prepare for multiple exams simultaneously, from academic tests to professional certifications.

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal