CTN Cash and Carry Ltd v Gallaher Ltd [1994] 4 All ER 714 (CA)

Facts

  • CTN Cash and Carry Ltd ordered cigarettes from Gallaher Ltd.
  • Gallaher mistakenly delivered the cigarettes to the wrong warehouse, resulting in the cigarettes being stolen.
  • Gallaher, under the belief that the risk of loss had passed to CTN, insisted on payment for the stolen goods.
  • Gallaher threatened to withdraw CTN's credit facilities if payment was not made.
  • CTN, dependent on these credit facilities, paid under protest and later sought to recover the sum.

Issues

  1. Whether Gallaher’s threat to withdraw credit facilities constituted duress.
  2. Whether the payment made under protest could be recovered on the grounds of lawful act duress.
  3. Where the boundary lies between legitimate commercial pressure and illegitimate commercial coercion in contract law.

Decision

  • The Court of Appeal held that Gallaher’s threat to withdraw credit facilities did not amount to duress.
  • The court recognized that Gallaher genuinely believed it was entitled to payment, even if mistaken.
  • The actions taken by Gallaher were within the scope of acceptable commercial pressure and not illegitimate.
  • The payment made by CTN could not be recovered, as the contract was not entered into under unlawful or illegitimate duress.

Legal Principles

  • Lawful act duress requires not merely pressure but an illegitimate threat, even if the threatened act is otherwise lawful.
  • A bona fide belief in entitlement to payment weighs against a finding of duress, even if that belief is mistaken.
  • Commercial pressure, including leveraging bargaining power and enforcing credit terms, is not duress unless the pressure is illegitimate.
  • Demands and threats falling within recognized commercial practices do not invalidate contracts; the mere existence of commercial bargaining does not cross into duress absent bad faith or exploitation.

Conclusion

The case confirms that legitimate commercial pressure, including robust negotiation tactics that use lawful means such as altering credit terms, does not constitute duress unless the pressure is illegitimate. Courts will uphold contracts formed under such commercial circumstances, reinforcing the principle of freedom of contract and offering guidance on the limited scope of lawful act duress in commercial transactions.

The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising. This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.
No resources available.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of May 2025. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

All-in-one Learning Platform

Everything you need to master your assessments and job tests in one place

  • Comprehensive Content

    Access thousands of fully explained questions and cases across multiple subjects

  • Visual Learning

    Understand complex concepts with intuitive diagrams and flowcharts

  • Focused Practice

    Prepare for assessments with targeted practice materials and expert guidance

  • Personalized Learning

    Track your progress and focus on areas where you need improvement

  • Affordable Access

    Get quality educational resources at a fraction of traditional costs

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal