## Facts

- Glenn E. Edgar created trusts in which he was both the grantor and the life beneficiary of trust income.
- The trustee invested trust corpus in two limited partnerships; the trusts (not Edgar individually) were the limited partners under the partnership agreements.
- The partnerships generated net operating losses in 1962–1964, allocable to the trusts as partners.
- On his joint individual returns, Edgar claimed deductions for the trusts’ distributive shares of the partnerships’ operating losses, asserting the losses should pass through to him because he was grantor and income beneficiary.
- Edgar also claimed charitable contribution deductions based on charitable remainder interests in trusts created in 1962, even though one trust corpus included a business venture interest and another included depreciable real estate.
- The Commissioner determined income tax deficiencies for 1962–1964 by disallowing the partnership loss deductions and disputing aspects of the charitable contribution deductions.

## Issues

1. Whether a grantor and life-income beneficiary may deduct, on an individual return, partnership operating losses allocable to trusts that are the actual limited partners.
2. Whether charitable contribution deductions are allowable for the value of charitable remainder interests in trusts where the corpus consists of a business venture interest and depreciable real estate.

## Decision

- The Tax Court held Edgar could not deduct the trusts’ shares of partnership operating losses for 1962–1964.
- The court found the trusts, not Edgar, were the partners; Edgar did not establish he was a partner in his individual capacity.
- The court rejected Edgar’s analogy that trust losses should be “distributed” like trust income to the beneficiary for deduction purposes.
- The Tax Court held Edgar was entitled to charitable contribution deductions for the value of the remainder interests in the 1962 trusts, notwithstanding the nature of the underlying trust assets.

## Legal Principles

- Partnership income and loss are allocated to the partner; when a trust is the partner, the trust (not the grantor or income beneficiary) is allocated the partnership items absent a statutory basis to treat the individual as owner of the partnership interest.
- An income beneficiary’s right to trust income does not confer ownership of trust corpus and does not, by itself, permit the beneficiary to claim trust-level partnership losses.
- Trust distribution rules that permit “carry out” of income to beneficiaries do not create a general rule allowing trust losses to pass through and be deducted by beneficiaries.
- Charitable contribution deductions may be allowed for qualifying charitable remainder interests in trust even if trust corpus includes business interests or depreciable property, subject to satisfaction of applicable structural and valuation requirements.

## Conclusion

The Tax Court sustained the Commissioner’s disallowance of Edgar’s deductions for partnership losses because the trusts—not Edgar—were the partners and the losses remained at the trust level, but it allowed Edgar’s charitable contribution deductions for the value of charitable remainder interests in the 1962 trusts despite the character of the trust assets.


Edgar v. Commissioner, 56 T.C. 717 (1971)