Elliot v C (A Minor) [1983] 2 All ER 1005

Facts

  • The defendant was a 14-year-old girl with learning difficulties and below average intelligence.
  • She poured white spirit on the floor of a shed and lit it, causing a fire that resulted in damage.
  • Initial judges found her not guilty, concluding she did not understand the risk of the fire spreading.
  • A higher court reversed the acquittal, applying the Caldwell test and finding her guilty of recklessness on the basis that a reasonable person would have foreseen the risk.

Issues

  1. Whether the objective Caldwell test for recklessness should be applied regardless of the defendant's personal characteristics or mental limitations.
  2. Whether holding defendants like C criminally liable is fair when they may not appreciate obvious risks due to intellectual impairments.
  3. Whether the legal standard for recklessness should consider subjective awareness of risk.

Decision

  • The court applied the Caldwell test in a strictly objective manner, disregarding the defendant’s personal limitations.
  • It held that the risk of fire spreading was obvious to a reasonable person.
  • The defendant was found to be reckless and thus criminally liable, despite not having personally foreseen or understood the risk.

Legal Principles

  • The Caldwell test for recklessness is objective, focusing on whether a reasonable person would have recognized the risk, not the defendant’s subjective state of mind.
  • Personal characteristics, such as limited intelligence or learning difficulties, were deemed irrelevant to the assessment of risk under this test.
  • The strict objectivity of the Caldwell standard led to criticism and debates about fairness, especially regarding vulnerable defendants.
  • The reasoning in Elliot v C influenced the later development of law, which moved towards a subjective standard of recklessness in R v G and another [2003] UKHL 50.

Conclusion

Elliot v C (A Minor) established the rigid application of the objective test for recklessness in criminal law, leading to concerns about unfairness for defendants with limited understanding. The case contributed to a shift in legal standards, as subsequent authorities adopted a subjective test for recklessness, better aligning criminal responsibility with individual awareness and capacity.

The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising. This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.
No resources available.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of May 2025. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

All-in-one Learning Platform

Everything you need to master your assessments and job tests in one place

  • Comprehensive Content

    Access thousands of fully explained questions and cases across multiple subjects

  • Visual Learning

    Understand complex concepts with intuitive diagrams and flowcharts

  • Focused Practice

    Prepare for assessments with targeted practice materials and expert guidance

  • Personalized Learning

    Track your progress and focus on areas where you need improvement

  • Affordable Access

    Get quality educational resources at a fraction of traditional costs

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal