Entores Ltd v Miles Far East Corporation [1955] 2 QB 327

Facts

  • Entores Ltd, based in London, offered to purchase 100 tons of copper cathodes from Miles Far East Corporation, based in Amsterdam.
  • The offer and subsequent acceptance were communicated via Telex, an instantaneous messaging device.
  • Miles Far East Corp sent its acceptance to Entores through Telex.
  • A dispute arose when Miles Far East Corp failed to fulfil the contract, prompting Entores to sue for damages.
  • The location of contract formation became critical in determining which jurisdiction’s laws would govern, as the contract could be deemed formed either in the Netherlands (acceptance sent) or in England (acceptance received).
  • The main question revolved around whether acceptance was effective when sent (in Amsterdam) or when received (in London).

Issues

  1. Whether acceptance via instantaneous communication (such as Telex) is effective at the moment of sending or upon receipt by the offeror.
  2. Whether the postal rule applies to communications conducted via instantaneous means.
  3. How the determination of the time and place of acceptance affects the choice of governing legal jurisdiction.

Decision

  • The Court of Appeal held that the postal rule does not apply to instantaneous forms of communication like Telex.
  • Acceptance is effective when, and where, it is received by the offeror.
  • The contract between Entores and Miles Far East Corp was formed in London, making English law applicable.
  • The court emphasized that, in instantaneous communications, acceptance must be successfully received and understood by the offeror for a contract to be formed.

Legal Principles

  • The postal rule, under which acceptance takes effect upon dispatch, does not extend to instantaneous communications.
  • For methods like Telex, telephone, or similar technologies, acceptance is only valid upon the offeror’s actual receipt of the message.
  • The rules for contract formation must reflect the nature of the communication medium, ensuring that contractual duties only arise when both parties are mutually aware of agreement.
  • A clear distinction exists between non-instantaneous and instantaneous communication methods for the purpose of establishing offer and acceptance.

Conclusion

Entores Ltd v Miles Far East Corporation [1955] 2 QB 327 established that in cases of instantaneous communication, acceptance is effective upon receipt by the offeror, not upon dispatch. This clear delineation rejected the application of the postal rule to modern communications and tied the location and timing of contract formation to the moment and place the acceptance is received, thereby determining applicable law and ensuring contract law remains responsive to technological changes.

The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising. This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.
No resources available.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of May 2025. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

All-in-one Learning Platform

Everything you need to master your assessments and job tests in one place

  • Comprehensive Content

    Access thousands of fully explained questions and cases across multiple subjects

  • Visual Learning

    Understand complex concepts with intuitive diagrams and flowcharts

  • Focused Practice

    Prepare for assessments with targeted practice materials and expert guidance

  • Personalized Learning

    Track your progress and focus on areas where you need improvement

  • Affordable Access

    Get quality educational resources at a fraction of traditional costs

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal