Facts
- The dispute arose over a strip of land adjacent to a petrol station.
- The plaintiff, Epps, claimed adverse possession of the land based on occasional use over several years.
- Esso Petroleum, the defendant, opposed the claim, asserting the use was neither continuous nor exclusive.
- Activities by Epps included parking vehicles and storing materials on the land.
- The land in question was neither enclosed nor demarcated by physical barriers indicating exclusive control.
Issues
- Whether occasional and sporadic use of land constitutes sufficient occupation for adverse possession under the Limitation Act 1939.
- Whether the plaintiff demonstrated the necessary intention to possess and exclude others, including the legal owner.
- Whether the distinction between use and occupation was satisfied by the plaintiff’s activities.
Decision
- The Court of Appeal held that occasional use of the land, without continuous and exclusive control, was insufficient for adverse possession.
- Epps's activities, including parking vehicles and storage, did not demonstrate factual possession or intent to exclude others.
- The absence of physical markers or exclusive control undermined the claim.
- The sporadic nature of the plaintiff's use indicated a lack of intent to possess, leading to rejection of the adverse possession claim.
Legal Principles
- Occasional or intermittent land use does not meet the standard required for adverse possession.
- Adverse possession requires both factual possession (physical control) and the intention to possess (intent to exclude others).
- Use of land is distinct from occupation; only consistent occupation with exclusive control may give rise to adverse possession rights.
- Claimants bear the burden of providing clear evidence of continuous and exclusive use as well as intent to possess.
Conclusion
Epps v Esso Petroleum confirms that only continuous, exclusive control and clear intention to possess can support a claim to adverse possession; occasional or sporadic use is legally insufficient to displace the rights of the legal owner.