## Facts

- Emilia W. Olivo died intestate on April 26, 2003, in New Jersey, survived by four children, including Anthony M. Olivo, who lived with her and provided extensive caregiving.
- After a 1994 injury, the decedent suffered severe mobility limitations; her husband also had serious health problems.
- Mr. Olivo (an attorney) substantially reduced or abandoned his legal practice while providing near full-time care to his parents.
- Mr. Olivo asserted the decedent orally agreed to compensate him at her death for caregiving services, reflected as a $1,240,000 “claim against the estate.”
- There was no written caregiver agreement, no contemporaneous billing, and no pattern of payments; the asserted claim had not been approved by the probate court when the estate tax return was filed.
- The estate’s Form 706 deducted $1,240,000 as a debt owed to Mr. Olivo, along with deductions for an administrator’s commission and professional fees.
- The IRS issued a notice of deficiency determining an estate tax deficiency and an accuracy-related penalty; after concessions, the dispute centered on the deductibility of the caregiving claim and the extent of allowable administration-expense deductions.

## Issues

1. Whether the estate could deduct $1,240,000 as a claim against the estate for Mr. Olivo’s caregiving services under I.R.C. § 2053.
2. Whether, and to what extent, the estate could deduct the administrator’s commission paid or payable to Mr. Olivo.
3. Whether, and to what extent, the estate could deduct claimed accountant’s and attorney’s fees as administration expenses.

## Decision

- The court disallowed the $1,240,000 deduction for caregiving services in full.
- The court allowed only the portion of the administrator’s commission that was adequately substantiated, reasonable, and allowable under local law; the remainder was disallowed.
- The court allowed only those accounting and legal fees shown to be actually incurred, necessary to administration, reasonable in amount, and supported by evidence; the remainder was disallowed.

## Legal Principles

- A deduction under I.R.C. § 2053 for a “claim against the estate” requires a bona fide, legally enforceable obligation under applicable state law.
- Under New Jersey law, personal services rendered by a child to a parent in a family setting are presumed gratuitous; the claimant must rebut the presumption by a preponderance of the evidence through proof of an express or implied agreement to pay.
- Unsupported testimony, absent corroborating documentation or third-party evidence, may be insufficient to establish a deductible, enforceable intrafamily compensation obligation.
- Quantum meruit or implied-contract theories do not avoid the intrafamily presumption of gratuitousness without persuasive evidence that the decedent intended compensation.
- Administrator commissions and professional fees are deductible as administration expenses only to the extent they are actually incurred (or properly payable), reasonable, and substantiated.

## Conclusion

The court held that the estate could not deduct a $1.24 million intrafamily caregiving “debt” because it failed to prove an enforceable obligation under New Jersey law, and it limited administration-expense deductions to amounts that were reasonable, necessary, and adequately documented.


Estate of Olivo v. Comm’r, T.C. Memo. 2011-163 (2011)