European Commission v United Kingdom (C-300/95) [1997] CMLR 923

Facts

  • The European Commission brought a case against the United Kingdom alleging failures in implementing Directive 92/59/EEC, the General Product Safety Directive.
  • Directive 92/59/EEC required member states to adopt measures to prevent the distribution of unsafe products, establish robust market surveillance, and ensure uniform product safety standards across the EU.
  • The Commission contended that the UK had not fully transposed the directive’s requirements, particularly regarding market surveillance, enforcement mechanisms, and consistent notification procedures.
  • The United Kingdom argued its national laws, including the Consumer Protection Act 1987, were sufficient to satisfy the directive.
  • The Advocate General reviewed the UK’s national provisions, comparing them to the directive’s requirements, and identified discrepancies in the UK’s approach.

Issues

  1. Whether the United Kingdom had fully and accurately transposed Directive 92/59/EEC into its national law as required by EU obligations.
  2. Whether the UK’s existing legal framework provided sufficient measures for market surveillance, enforcement, and the notification of product safety concerns to comply with EU law.
  3. Whether incomplete or imprecise transposition of EU product safety directives undermined consumer protection and the internal market.

Decision

  • The Advocate General found that the UK’s implementation of Directive 92/59/EEC was insufficient in several respects, including inadequate market surveillance and lack of specific enforcement and notification mechanisms.
  • Discrepancies between national law and the directive’s requirements were identified, particularly regarding the robustness and formality of market surveillance systems.
  • The Advocate General concluded that the UK failed to fulfill its obligations under the directive and recommended a finding in favor of the European Commission.
  • The case highlighted the necessity for uniform and precise legal transposition by member states to achieve EU product safety objectives.

Legal Principles

  • EU directives must be transposed into national law by member states in a manner that fully achieves their objectives; partial or incomplete transposition is insufficient.
  • Robust and explicit market surveillance and enforcement mechanisms are essential to meet EU product safety standards.
  • Effective and specific procedures for notifying the European Commission of product safety measures are required under EU law.
  • The European Commission is responsible for monitoring compliance and can initiate proceedings against member states that fail to meet their obligations.

Conclusion

The Advocate General’s opinion held that the United Kingdom did not fully comply with Directive 92/59/EEC on product safety, emphasizing the necessity of precise and comprehensive transposition of EU directives, strong market surveillance, and effective enforcement to ensure consumer protection and market uniformity across the EU.

The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising. This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.
No resources available.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of May 2025. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

All-in-one Learning Platform

Everything you need to master your assessments and job tests in one place

  • Comprehensive Content

    Access thousands of fully explained questions and cases across multiple subjects

  • Visual Learning

    Understand complex concepts with intuitive diagrams and flowcharts

  • Focused Practice

    Prepare for assessments with targeted practice materials and expert guidance

  • Personalized Learning

    Track your progress and focus on areas where you need improvement

  • Affordable Access

    Get quality educational resources at a fraction of traditional costs

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal