F v West Berkshire Health Authority [1990] 2 AC 1 (HL)

Facts

  • F v West Berkshire Health Authority [1990] 2 AC 1 concerned the lawfulness of providing medical treatment to individuals incapable of providing consent.
  • The case addressed the legal framework for when doctors may intervene medically where a patient lacks capacity, focusing on the application of the doctrine of necessity and the requirement that treatment be in the patient's best interests.
  • The House of Lords reviewed circumstances in which judicial oversight may be required, including situations involving significant interventions such as sterilization or withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment.
  • The case examined the roles of medical professionals, family members, and the courts in decision-making on behalf of incapacitated patients.

Issues

  1. Whether the doctrine of necessity justifies medical treatment without consent for patients lacking capacity.
  2. What criteria determine whether such treatment is lawful, particularly regarding the patient's best interests.
  3. Whether judicial oversight is required for significant medical decisions made for incapacitated individuals.
  4. What safeguards and procedural requirements must be observed by medical professionals and the courts in these cases.

Decision

  • The House of Lords held that medical intervention without consent may be justified under the doctrine of necessity where the patient cannot provide consent.
  • Treatment must be objectively assessed as being in the patient’s best interests, considering medical, emotional, and social factors.
  • Judicial approval is required for major decisions, such as sterilization or withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment, to ensure legal and ethical compliance.
  • The decision established procedural requirements, including the presentation of comprehensive medical evidence and multidisciplinary input.
  • The welfare of the incapacitated patient must remain the primary consideration in all decisions.

Legal Principles

  • The doctrine of necessity permits treatment without consent when necessary to prevent harm or preserve life, not restricted to emergencies.
  • Lawful treatment requires an objective, evidence-based assessment that the intervention is in the patient's best interests.
  • Judicial oversight acts as a safeguard for significant medical decisions involving incapacitated patients.
  • Best interests assessments must incorporate medical, emotional, and social factors and avoid subjective or biased judgments.
  • Medical professionals have an ongoing duty of care that includes ethical and legal responsibilities to incapacitated patients.

Conclusion

The House of Lords in F v West Berkshire Health Authority [1990] 2 AC 1 established that necessity may justify medical treatment for incapacitated patients when objectively assessed as being in their best interests, with judicial scrutiny and procedural safeguards required for significant interventions, shaping the legal and ethical framework for medical decision-making without consent.

The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising. This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.
No resources available.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of May 2025. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

All-in-one Learning Platform

Everything you need to master your assessments and job tests in one place

  • Comprehensive Content

    Access thousands of fully explained questions and cases across multiple subjects

  • Visual Learning

    Understand complex concepts with intuitive diagrams and flowcharts

  • Focused Practice

    Prepare for assessments with targeted practice materials and expert guidance

  • Personalized Learning

    Track your progress and focus on areas where you need improvement

  • Affordable Access

    Get quality educational resources at a fraction of traditional costs

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal