## Facts

- Fallimento Olimiclub Srl concerned a conflict between Italian insolvency law and a Council Directive on the reorganization and winding-up of credit institutions.
- The Italian courts had issued a final judgment before the European Court of Justice (ECJ) interpreted the relevant Directive in a subsequent case.
- The case addressed whether the Italian final judgment could be reopened following the ECJ’s definitive interpretation of EU law.

## Issues

1. Whether the principle of EU law supremacy requires national courts to reopen final judgments that conflict with subsequently clarified EU law.
2. Under what conditions may a final national judgment be reopened to comply with a new, definitive interpretation of EU law by the ECJ.
3. How the principles of EU law supremacy and national procedural autonomy interact in determining access to mechanisms for reopening final judgments.

## Decision

- The ECJ held that the supremacy of EU law may, in principle, require the reopening of a final national judgment to ensure compliance with EU law.
- Reopening is conditional on the ECJ providing a new and definitive interpretation of the relevant EU law that could not have been reasonably foreseen at the time of the final judgment.
- The absence of other effective remedies is a prerequisite for reopening a final judgment; if alternatives exist, reopening may not be necessary.
- National procedural autonomy is respected but cannot render the exercise of EU rights practically impossible or excessively difficult; national courts must have mechanisms for reopening where EU law requires it.

## Legal Principles

- The supremacy of EU law obliges national courts to disapply conflicting national provisions, including those with constitutional status.
- National procedural autonomy allows Member States to set procedural rules, but these are limited by the principle of effectiveness of EU law.
- The ECJ confirmed that the effectiveness and uniform application of EU law may require overriding even final national judgments in certain circumstances.
- Mechanisms for reopening final judgments must be available when necessary for compliance with EU law, provided specific criteria are met.

## Conclusion

The ECJ in Olimiclub established that the supremacy of EU law may obligate the reopening of final national judgments if a new and unforeseeable interpretation by the ECJ so requires and if no other remedies exist, balancing the effectiveness of EU law with respect for national procedural rules.

Fallimento Olimiclub Srl v Fondo Interbancario di Tutela dei Depositi (Case C-2/08) [2009] ECR I-7501