Welcome

Fletcher v Fletcher [1844] 4 Hare 67

ResourcesFletcher v Fletcher [1844] 4 Hare 67

Facts

  • Ellis Fletcher made a voluntary covenant, under seal and without consideration, to pay £60,000 to trustees for the benefit of his illegitimate sons.
  • Upon Ellis Fletcher's death, a dispute arose over whether the covenant could be enforced as a trust.
  • The plaintiffs, representing the intended beneficiaries, claimed the covenant created a binding trust.
  • The defendants argued the covenant was merely a voluntary, unenforceable promise lacking legal effect, due to the absence of consideration.
  • The court needed to determine if the covenant fulfilled requirements for a valid trust, including certainty of intention and identifiable trust property.

Issues

  1. Whether a voluntary covenant without consideration can create a trust enforceable in equity.
  2. Whether the covenant demonstrated sufficient certainty of intention to create a trust.
  3. Whether the subject matter and beneficiaries were sufficiently certain to establish a valid trust.
  4. Whether equity could enforce the covenant as a trust despite the absence of consideration.

Decision

  • The court held that the voluntary covenant did create a binding trust.
  • It was found that the necessary certainties—intention, subject matter, and objects—were satisfied.
  • The court determined that equity could enforce the covenant as a trust, notwithstanding the lack of consideration.
  • The judgment favored the plaintiffs, allowing enforcement of the covenant for the benefit of the intended beneficiaries.
  • A voluntary covenant may create a trust if there is clear intention, identifiable trust property, and definite beneficiaries.
  • Certainty of intention can be inferred from the language of the covenant and the surrounding circumstances.
  • The absence of consideration does not prevent equity from enforcing a trust when the three certainties are satisfied.
  • Equity may act to ensure the settlor's intentions to benefit others are implemented, even if the requirements of contract law are unmet.

Conclusion

Fletcher v Fletcher [1844] 4 Hare 67 clarified that equity will enforce a voluntary covenant as a trust when the requirements of certainty and clear intention are present, regardless of the absence of consideration, reaffirming the flexibility of equity in trust law.

Assistant

Responses can be incorrect. Please double check.