Foremost Ins. Co. v. Richardson, 457 U.S. 668 (1982)

Facts

  • Clyde Richardson and Shirley Eliser each operated small pleasure boats on the Amite River, a navigable waterway in Louisiana.
  • The boats collided, killing Richardson.
  • Richardson’s widow and heirs sued Eliser and Eliser’s insurer, Foremost Insurance Company, in federal court, alleging negligence.
  • Plaintiffs invoked federal admiralty jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1333(1).
  • Neither vessel had been used for commercial purposes; both were purely recreational.

Issues

  1. Whether a tort claim arising from a collision between two pleasure boats on navigable waters falls within federal admiralty jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1333(1).
  2. Whether admiralty jurisdiction requires that the incident bear a significant relationship to traditional maritime activity and, if so, whether that relationship must be commercial in nature.

Decision

  • The Supreme Court affirmed the Fifth Circuit and held that the case fell within federal admiralty jurisdiction.
  • A complaint alleging a collision between two vessels, including pleasure boats, on navigable waters states a claim within admiralty jurisdiction.
  • The Court applied the “significant relationship to traditional maritime activity” requirement beyond aviation cases.
  • The Court rejected any rule limiting admiralty jurisdiction to incidents involving commercial maritime activity.
  • Admiralty tort jurisdiction generally requires both: (1) locality on navigable waters and (2) a significant relationship to traditional maritime activity.
  • The “significant relationship to traditional maritime activity” requirement applies outside the aviation context.
  • Navigation and collision of vessels on navigable waters are traditional maritime activities sufficient to satisfy the maritime nexus requirement.
  • Admiralty jurisdiction does not depend on whether a vessel is engaged in commercial use; uniform federal navigation rules apply to all vessel operators on navigable waters.

Conclusion

Federal admiralty jurisdiction extends to wrongful-death and negligence claims arising from collisions between recreational vessels on navigable waters because vessel navigation is a traditional maritime activity and the jurisdictional inquiry does not turn on commercial use.