Furniss v Dawson [1984] STC 153 (HL)

Facts

  • The taxpayers sought to avoid capital gains tax on the sale of shares.
  • They inserted a Jersey company as an intermediate step: shares were first transferred to this company, which then sold them to the final purchaser.
  • The purpose of involving the Jersey company was to obtain a tax advantage.
  • The House of Lords, applying the Ramsay principle, found that the transfer to the Jersey company lacked commercial substance and was inserted solely for tax avoidance purposes.

Issues

  1. Whether artificial steps in a transaction lacking genuine commercial purpose, introduced solely for tax avoidance, should be disregarded in determining tax liability.
  2. Whether the overall transaction should be assessed as a composite whole, rather than by examining each step in isolation.

Decision

  • The House of Lords held that the transfer to the Jersey company should be disregarded, as it had no commercial purpose beyond tax avoidance.
  • The transaction was treated as a direct sale from the original shareholders to the ultimate purchaser.
  • The taxpayers were held liable for capital gains tax on the basis of the true substance of the transaction.
  • The judgment extended and clarified the Ramsay principle, focusing on the commercial purpose of transaction steps.

Legal Principles

  • The Ramsay principle allows courts to disregard steps inserted solely for tax avoidance that lack commercial or business purpose.
  • Assessing the substance of a transaction as a whole takes precedence over a strict step-by-step legal analysis when artificial steps are identified.
  • Every step in a transaction does not require an independent commercial purpose, but artificial arrangements serving only a tax avoidance function may be ignored.
  • Establishing genuine commercial reasons for steps in complex transactions helps avoid the application of the Ramsay principle.

Conclusion

Furniss v Dawson significantly advanced the Ramsay principle, enabling courts to ignore artificially inserted steps in tax avoidance schemes that lack commercial purpose, thus ensuring tax liability is determined by the true substance of transactions rather than their artificial legal form.

The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising. This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.
No resources available.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of May 2025. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

All-in-one Learning Platform

Everything you need to master your assessments and job tests in one place

  • Comprehensive Content

    Access thousands of fully explained questions and cases across multiple subjects

  • Visual Learning

    Understand complex concepts with intuitive diagrams and flowcharts

  • Focused Practice

    Prepare for assessments with targeted practice materials and expert guidance

  • Personalized Learning

    Track your progress and focus on areas where you need improvement

  • Affordable Access

    Get quality educational resources at a fraction of traditional costs

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal