Gamerco v ICM [1995] 1 WLR 1226 (CA)

Facts

  • Gamerco SA, a concert promoter, entered into a contract with ICM/Fair Warning (Agency) Ltd for Guns N' Roses to perform at a Madrid stadium.
  • Before the event, Spanish authorities deemed the stadium unsafe and revoked the permit, making performance impossible.
  • The contract was frustrated due to this external event beyond the parties' control.
  • Gamerco had incurred expenses including advertising costs, travel arrangements, and other pre-concert expenditures.
  • Gamerco sought recovery of these expenses under the Law Reform (Frustrated Contracts) Act 1943.

Issues

  1. Whether the contract was frustrated by the revocation of the stadium permit by Spanish authorities.
  2. Whether, under section 1(2) of the Law Reform (Frustrated Contracts) Act 1943, Gamerco could recover expenses incurred prior to the frustrating event.
  3. How the court's discretion should be exercised in determining a “just sum” for the recovery of expenses.

Decision

  • The court found that the contract was frustrated due to the withdrawal of the stadium permit, which was outside both parties’ control.
  • It held that section 1(2) of the 1943 Act gave the court discretion to allow a party to recover expenses incurred before frustration if it was just to do so considering all the circumstances.
  • The court examined the specific expenses claimed and concluded that Gamerco could recover a portion of its pre-frustration expenses.
  • The "just sum" awarded reflected a fair allocation of losses between the parties, not necessarily the full amount claimed.

Legal Principles

  • Section 1(2) of the Law Reform (Frustrated Contracts) Act 1943 permits discretionary recovery of expenses incurred prior to the frustrating event.
  • The court's determination of a "just sum" is not automatic or formulaic, but depends on fairness, party conduct, and the circumstances.
  • The Act provides a statutory mechanism ensuring equitable distribution of losses when a contract is rendered impossible without fault of either party.

Conclusion

Gamerco SA v ICM/Fair Warning (Agency) Ltd confirms the application of section 1(2) of the Law Reform (Frustrated Contracts) Act 1943, granting courts broad discretion to award reimbursement for pre-frustration expenses where just, with a focus on fairness and equitable balancing of losses caused by unforeseen events frustrating contractual performance.

The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising. This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.
No resources available.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of May 2025. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

All-in-one Learning Platform

Everything you need to master your assessments and job tests in one place

  • Comprehensive Content

    Access thousands of fully explained questions and cases across multiple subjects

  • Visual Learning

    Understand complex concepts with intuitive diagrams and flowcharts

  • Focused Practice

    Prepare for assessments with targeted practice materials and expert guidance

  • Personalized Learning

    Track your progress and focus on areas where you need improvement

  • Affordable Access

    Get quality educational resources at a fraction of traditional costs

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal