Gartside v IRC [1968] AC 553

Facts

  • John Gartside established a discretionary trust under his will, providing for the distribution of income and capital among a class of beneficiaries including his son.
  • Upon the death of one of the beneficiaries, the Inland Revenue Commissioners sought to include the value of the deceased's interest in the trust fund as part of the estate for calculating estate duty under the Finance Act 1940.
  • The trustees argued that the deceased's interest could not be valued, as it depended solely on the trustees' exercise of discretion.
  • The Inland Revenue Commissioners contended that the value of the trust fund should be apportioned among the beneficiaries and the deceased’s share included in their estate.
  • The matter reached the House of Lords, focusing on whether an individual beneficiary's interest in a discretionary trust could be quantified for estate duty purposes.

Issues

  1. Whether the value of a beneficiary's interest in a discretionary trust can be quantified in isolation for the purpose of calculating estate duty.
  2. Whether the beneficiary's interest constituted property that should be included in the deceased’s estate under the Finance Act 1940.
  3. Whether the collective rights of all beneficiaries or individual interests should form the basis for valuation in the context of discretionary trusts.

Decision

  • The House of Lords unanimously held that the value of a beneficiary's interest in a discretionary trust could not be quantified in isolation.
  • The court reasoned that beneficiaries' rights in a discretionary trust are collective and contingent, reliant on the trustees' discretion; no single beneficiary has a fixed entitlement to any portion of the trust property.
  • Attempting to assign a value to any individual beneficiary’s interest was deemed speculative and impractical given the uncertainty introduced by the trustees' discretion.
  • The court concluded that, for tax and estate duty purposes, only the trust fund as a whole and the collective rights of all possible beneficiaries could be considered, not isolated interests.

Legal Principles

  • In a discretionary trust, beneficiaries have no fixed entitlement; their interests are contingent on the trustees' discretion and cannot individually be valued.
  • The collective rights of all potential beneficiaries of a discretionary trust should be considered for tax and estate duty purposes rather than attempting individual valuation.
  • Attempts to apportion or value individual interests in discretionary trusts for taxation purposes are speculative and unreliable due to unavoidable uncertainty.

Conclusion

The House of Lords confirmed that the interest of an individual beneficiary in a discretionary trust cannot be valued in isolation for estate duty; instead, only the collective rights over the trust fund as a whole may be taken into account, fundamentally shaping the treatment of discretionary trusts in taxation and trust law.

The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising. This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.
No resources available.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of May 2025. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

All-in-one Learning Platform

Everything you need to master your assessments and job tests in one place

  • Comprehensive Content

    Access thousands of fully explained questions and cases across multiple subjects

  • Visual Learning

    Understand complex concepts with intuitive diagrams and flowcharts

  • Focused Practice

    Prepare for assessments with targeted practice materials and expert guidance

  • Personalized Learning

    Track your progress and focus on areas where you need improvement

  • Affordable Access

    Get quality educational resources at a fraction of traditional costs

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal