Facts
- Mr. Geys was employed by Société Générale under a contract allowing termination via three months’ written notice or payment in lieu.
- On 29 November 2007, Société Générale summarily dismissed Mr. Geys without immediately paying the sum in lieu.
- The relevant payment was made on 18 December 2007, but Mr. Geys was not notified of this payment until 4 January 2008.
- The precise date of contract termination affected the calculation of Mr. Geys' severance entitlement, with a later termination date increasing the payment owed.
- Mr. Geys claimed his contract terminated on 6 January 2008, after he received notification of payment in lieu, entitling him to a higher severance.
- The dispute centered on when the employment contract was terminated following the repudiatory breach by Société Générale.
Issues
- Whether a contract of employment terminates automatically upon a repudiatory breach (automatic theory) or only upon the innocent party electing to accept the breach (elective theory).
- How the timing of termination affects the employee’s entitlement to severance payment in cases of summary dismissal and payment in lieu of notice.
- Whether there is a distinction between dismissals/resignations and other contract breaches in the application of these theories.
Decision
- By a majority of 5 to 1, the Supreme Court found in favour of Mr. Geys, holding that the contract did not terminate automatically upon repudiatory breach.
- The Court held termination occurred on 6 January 2008, when Mr. Geys was deemed to have received notice of payment in lieu.
- The majority reasoned that automatic termination would unfairly allow the contract breaker to benefit from their breach and potentially manipulate the timing of employee severance benefits.
- The Court endorsed the elective theory, concluding the innocent party must accept the repudiation for termination to occur, even in employment contracts.
- A dissenting opinion by Lord Sumption favoured the automatic theory, especially concerning core obligations in employment contracts, but this view was not adopted.
- The Court rejected arguments that contracts lacking enforceable duties should be considered as automatically terminated following a repudiatory breach.
Legal Principles
- A contract is not automatically terminated upon a repudiatory breach; the innocent party has the right to elect whether to accept the breach.
- The elective theory gives the innocent party control over the timing of contract termination following breach, thus protecting their interests.
- Summary dismissal and payment in lieu of notice do not of themselves determine the date of termination unless notice is properly communicated and accepted.
- There is no justified distinction between types of employment contract breaches (such as dismissals or resignations) regarding the application of the elective theory.
Conclusion
The Supreme Court in Geys v Société Générale established that, even in employment contexts, a repudiatory breach does not terminate a contract unless and until the innocent party elects to accept the breach, affirming the principle of contractual autonomy and requiring explicit acceptance for effective termination.