Glasgow Corp v Taylor [1922] 1 AC 44

Facts

  • A seven-year-old boy died after eating poisonous berries from a shrub in Glasgow’s Botanic Gardens, owned and operated by Glasgow Corporation and open to the public.
  • The shrub with the berries was easily accessible, located near a low fence, and frequented by children.
  • No warning signs were present to indicate the danger posed by the shrub's berries.
  • The boy's father sued Glasgow Corporation, alleging negligence for failing to protect children from foreseeable harm on their premises.

Issues

  1. Whether Glasgow Corporation, as landowner, owed a heightened duty of care to children entering its premises.
  2. Whether failure to remove the poisonous shrub or warn visitors constituted a breach of that duty.
  3. Whether the harm suffered by the child was a foreseeable consequence of the defendant’s conduct.
  4. Whether the breach of duty by Glasgow Corporation was the direct cause of the child’s death.

Decision

  • The court affirmed that a heightened duty of care is owed by landowners to children, reflecting their limited capacity to identify certain dangers.
  • It was found that the lack of precautionary measures or warnings regarding the poisonous berries was negligent.
  • The court determined that the risk presented by the berries was foreseeable due to their attractiveness to children.
  • The breach of duty—failure to remove the plant or provide warnings—was directly linked to the child’s death.
  • The House of Lords held in favour of the claimant, allowing the case to go forward.

Legal Principles

  • Landowners owe a higher standard of care to children, especially where there are hazards that may be particularly attractive or alluring to them.
  • The concept of “allurement” identifies objects or features likely to attract children, increasing foreseeable risk.
  • Negligence is established where a landowner fails to take reasonable steps to mitigate or warn against foreseeable dangers to children.
  • A breach of duty leading directly to harm, particularly where the risk is foreseeable and directed at children, can result in liability for negligence.

Conclusion

Glasgow Corp v Taylor [1922] 1 AC 44 is a key authority on occupier’s liability, confirming that landowners must take affirmative steps to protect children from foreseeable dangers on their property, especially those risks that uniquely attract children and may not be readily apparent to them.

The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising. This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.
No resources available.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of May 2025. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

All-in-one Learning Platform

Everything you need to master your assessments and job tests in one place

  • Comprehensive Content

    Access thousands of fully explained questions and cases across multiple subjects

  • Visual Learning

    Understand complex concepts with intuitive diagrams and flowcharts

  • Focused Practice

    Prepare for assessments with targeted practice materials and expert guidance

  • Personalized Learning

    Track your progress and focus on areas where you need improvement

  • Affordable Access

    Get quality educational resources at a fraction of traditional costs

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal