## Facts

- A shipper delivered two parcels of goods to a railroad at Fort Dodge, Iowa, for carriage via Kansas City to Boonville, Missouri, and Chanute, Kansas.
- The parties stipulated the railroad was guilty of negligent delay in forwarding the goods from Fort Dodge to Kansas City.
- On May 30, 1903, while the goods were in Kansas City, they were lost or damaged by an unusual and extraordinary flood constituting an act of God.
- The parties stipulated that, absent the negligent delay, the goods would not have been caught in the flood or damaged by it.
- The case was tried on an agreed statement of facts; the trial court entered judgment for the railroad, and the shipper appealed.

## Issues

1. Whether a common carrier’s negligent delay is a proximate cause of loss when the immediate cause is an act of God, where the loss would not have occurred but for the delay.
2. Whether the act-of-God defense bars recovery when the carrier’s negligence exposed the shipment to the natural event.

## Decision

- The Iowa Supreme Court reversed the judgment for the railroad.
- The court held the carrier liable because its negligent delay subjected the goods to the flood hazard, and the loss would not have occurred without the delay.
- The act-of-God defense did not apply because the flood was not the sole cause of the loss; the carrier’s negligence was a contributing legal cause.

## Legal Principles

- A common carrier must transport goods with reasonable dispatch; negligent delay breaches that duty.
- An act of God relieves a carrier from liability only when it is the sole cause of the loss and the carrier is free from negligence contributing to the damage.
- When a carrier’s negligent delay places or leaves goods where an extraordinary natural event operates on them, and the loss would not have occurred but for the delay, the delay may be treated as a proximate cause, making the carrier liable despite the act-of-God character of the event.

## Conclusion

The court imposed liability on the carrier because the stipulated negligent delay was a proximate, contributing cause of the loss: it exposed the goods to an otherwise exempt act-of-God flood that would not have damaged them absent the delay.


Green-Wheeler Shoe Co. v. Chi., Rock Island & Pac. Ry. Co., 106 N.W. 498 (Iowa 1906)