## Facts

- Frederick Jackson wrote the stage play titled “Slightly Scandalous” in 1943.
- While the play was rehearsed in Los Angeles in 1944, a press agent distributed about 40 publicity stories to roughly 550 newspapers; only a small percentage was published.
- Published publicity included brief mentions in the Hollywood Reporter, the Los Angeles Evening Herald-Express, and Variety.
- The play opened in Philadelphia and later ran briefly in New York; it was not a commercial success and closed after a short run.
- Universal International Pictures produced and released a motion picture using the identical title, “Slightly Scandalous,” and advertised and exhibited the film under that name.
- The parties stipulated that about three months before the film’s release, Universal knew of Jackson’s play and consulted counsel about using the title.

## Issues

1. Whether the title “Slightly Scandalous” had acquired a secondary meaning such that the public associated it with Jackson’s play, giving him a protectable interest in the title.
2. If so, whether Universal’s use of the identical title for a motion picture constituted unfair competition or wrongful misappropriation.

## Decision

- The California Supreme Court reversed the judgment for Jackson.
- The court held the evidence was insufficient to prove the title had acquired secondary meaning identifying Jackson’s play in the public mind.
- Without a protectable interest in the title, Universal’s use of the same title did not support liability for unfair competition or misappropriation on the record presented.

## Legal Principles

- Titles of single literary or dramatic works are not exclusively protectable based solely on first use; protection requires proof of secondary meaning.
- Secondary meaning requires evidence that the relevant public associates the title with a particular source or work, not merely that the title was used or publicized.
- Limited or sporadic publicity, even through high-circulation outlets, and a work’s lack of commercial success may be insufficient to establish secondary meaning.
- A defendant’s knowledge of a prior work’s title does not create liability absent a showing that the plaintiff has a protectable proprietary interest in the title.

## Conclusion

Because Jackson failed to prove that “Slightly Scandalous” had come to identify his play to the public, he had no proprietary right in the title to enforce, and Universal’s identical use of the title for its film could not be treated as unfair competition or misappropriation on these facts.


Jackson v. Universal Int'l Pictures, 36 Cal. 2d 116, 222 P.2d 433 (Cal. 1950)