Welcome

KA v Belgische Staat (C-82/16), ECLI:EU:C:2018:308

ResourcesKA v Belgische Staat (C-82/16), ECLI:EU:C:2018:308

Facts

  • The case concerned several third-country nationals who were family members of Belgian citizens.
  • These Belgian citizens had previously exercised their right to free movement by residing in other EU Member States before returning to Belgium.
  • The third-country national family members applied for residence permits in Belgium.
  • Belgian authorities rejected these applications, arguing the EU citizens had not established sufficient ties in the host Member State prior to their return.
  • The dispute focused on the interpretation of Article 13(2)(b) of Directive 2004/38/EC, regarding derivative residence rights for family members of EU citizens returning to their Member State of origin.

Issues

  1. Whether Article 13(2)(b) of Directive 2004/38/EC requires the EU citizen to have established sufficient or prior ties in a host Member State for their third-country national family members to qualify for derivative residence rights upon returning to their Member State of origin.
  2. Whether imposing such a requirement undermines the objectives of Directive 2004/38/EC concerning family reunification and the free movement of persons.

Decision

  • The CJEU held that Article 13(2)(b) does not require the EU citizen to have become settled or established prior ties in the host Member State before returning.
  • The Court found that imposing such a condition would create an obstacle to the exercise of free movement rights and discourage EU citizens from returning to their home country.
  • It clarified that the purpose of the provision is to facilitate family reunification and protect the right to family life, not to create additional barriers to residence for family members.
  • The judgment removed a potential obstacle for third-country nationals seeking derivative residence rights upon the EU citizen's return to their home Member State.
  • Article 13(2)(b) of Directive 2004/38/EC should be interpreted to support family reunification and not hinder the free movement of EU citizens.
  • Requirements not expressly stated in the Directive, such as establishing prior ties in a host Member State, may not be imposed as prerequisites for derivative residence rights.
  • The CJEU reaffirmed that the effectiveness of the Free Movement Directive relies on preventing obstacles to returning EU citizens and their family members.
  • The judgment supports a consistent and coherent application of EU law on derivative residence rights across Member States.

Conclusion

The CJEU clarified that Article 13(2)(b) of Directive 2004/38/EC does not require EU citizens to have established prior ties in a host Member State for their third-country national family members to qualify for derivative residence rights upon return, strengthening the principle of family reunification and the effective exercise of free movement within the EU.

Assistant

How can I help you?
Expliquer en français
Explicar en español
Объяснить на русском
شرح بالعربية
用中文解释
हिंदी में समझाएं
Give me a quick summary
Break this down step by step
What are the key points?
Study companion mode
Homework helper mode
Loyal friend mode
Academic mentor mode
Expliquer en français
Explicar en español
Объяснить на русском
شرح بالعربية
用中文解释
हिंदी में समझाएं
Give me a quick summary
Break this down step by step
What are the key points?
Study companion mode
Homework helper mode
Loyal friend mode
Academic mentor mode

Responses can be incorrect. Please double check.