Knupffer v London Express Newspaper Ltd [1944] AC 116 (HL)

Facts

  • Knupffer was a member of the Russian political group, the "Young Russia Party."
  • London Express Newspaper Ltd published an article alleging the Young Russia Party was involved in subversive activities.
  • Knupffer was not named in the article, nor were details given to single him out.
  • Knupffer claimed the article defamed him personally, despite its reference to the group rather than to him individually.
  • The central question was whether a defamatory statement about a group could be actionable by an individual member.

Issues

  1. Whether a member of a group can bring a defamation claim when the defamatory statement refers to the group as a whole and does not specifically identify the individual.
  2. Whether the size and nature of the group affect whether a defamatory statement can reasonably be understood as referring to a specific person within the group.

Decision

  • The House of Lords held that group defamation is not actionable by individual members unless the statement specifically identifies them.
  • It was determined that the Young Russia Party was a large and loosely defined group, so the article was unlikely to be understood as referring to Knupffer in particular.
  • The article did not contain language or details that could reasonably single out Knupffer.
  • The court concluded that Knupffer could not bring a successful defamation claim as he was not specifically identified.

Legal Principles

  • Defamation requires the statement to have been published, to refer to the plaintiff, and to be defamatory.
  • For group defamation, the statement must be shown to refer directly to the individual claimant.
  • The likelihood of identification depends on factors including the size and nature of the group and the context of the publication.
  • In large groups, it is less likely an individual will be identified by defamatory statements directed at the group as a whole.
  • The decision established limits on group defamation actions, ensuring only those directly identified or specifically referred to can claim for defamation.

Conclusion

Knupffer v London Express Newspaper Ltd established that a defamatory statement about a group is only actionable by an individual if it can be shown to specifically identify and refer to that person; otherwise, no personal claim can succeed. This remains an important principle in English defamation law regarding group identification.

The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising. This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.
No resources available.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of May 2025. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

All-in-one Learning Platform

Everything you need to master your assessments and job tests in one place

  • Comprehensive Content

    Access thousands of fully explained questions and cases across multiple subjects

  • Visual Learning

    Understand complex concepts with intuitive diagrams and flowcharts

  • Focused Practice

    Prepare for assessments with targeted practice materials and expert guidance

  • Personalized Learning

    Track your progress and focus on areas where you need improvement

  • Affordable Access

    Get quality educational resources at a fraction of traditional costs

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal