Krell v Henry [1903] 2 KB 740

Facts

  • Mr. Krell (claimant) and Mr. Henry (defendant) entered into a contract for the rental of a flat in Pall Mall on 26 and 27 June 1902.
  • The rental dates coincided with the planned coronation processions of King Edward VII, although the contract did not expressly mention the coronation.
  • Circumstances indicated the flat was rented specifically to view the coronation procession, being particularly suitable for that purpose.
  • Mr. Henry paid a deposit, but the coronation was postponed due to the King’s illness, resulting in cancellation of the procession.
  • Mr. Krell sought the outstanding rent, but Mr. Henry argued the contract was frustrated because the event did not take place.

Issues

  1. Whether a contract can be frustrated where an unforeseen event destroys the essential purpose for which the contract was entered, even though literal performance remains possible.
  2. Whether the continued existence of the coronation procession constituted an implied condition or term fundamental to the contract.
  3. Whether the absence of an express reference to the procession in the contract prevented the application of frustration.

Decision

  • The Court of Appeal held that the contract had been frustrated as the procession was the basis of the contract, and its cancellation removed the sole reason for the agreement.
  • Vaughan Williams LJ determined that frustration extends beyond physical impossibility to situations where a specific state of affairs was fundamentally assumed by the parties.
  • The court inferred an implied condition that the procession would take place; its non-occurrence rendered the contract's performance radically different from what was contemplated.
  • The court contrasted this with contracts where only the purpose, not the basis, was affected, as illustrated by the "cab to Epsom on Derby Day" analogy.
  • The contract was discharged, and Mr. Henry was relieved from further performance.

Legal Principles

  • The doctrine of frustration discharges a contract when a supervening event, unforeseen and not attributable to either party, makes performance impossible or radically different from that originally agreed.
  • Frustration may result from the destruction of the contract’s purpose, not solely from physical impossibility.
  • Implied terms may be recognized based on the parties’ presumed intentions and the surrounding circumstances.
  • Not every event cancellation results in frustration; the event must remove the fundamental basis of the agreement.
  • The doctrine applies restrictively, excluding circumstances where obligations simply become less beneficial, as subsequently confirmed in cases like Davis Contractors v Fareham UDC [1956] AC 696.

Conclusion

Krell v Henry established that contracts may be frustrated where an unforeseen event destroys their fundamental purpose, even if literal performance remains possible. The decision clarified and expanded the doctrine of frustration in English contract law, with the court recognizing implied terms based on the contract's core premise and continuing to require a radical change in the obligation for frustration to apply.

The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising. This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.
No resources available.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of May 2025. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

All-in-one Learning Platform

Everything you need to master your assessments and job tests in one place

  • Comprehensive Content

    Access thousands of fully explained questions and cases across multiple subjects

  • Visual Learning

    Understand complex concepts with intuitive diagrams and flowcharts

  • Focused Practice

    Prepare for assessments with targeted practice materials and expert guidance

  • Personalized Learning

    Track your progress and focus on areas where you need improvement

  • Affordable Access

    Get quality educational resources at a fraction of traditional costs

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal