## Facts

- L.L. Constantin & Co. (Constantin), a New Jersey corporation, authorized and issued 50,000 shares of $10-par preferred stock pursuant to a December 23, 1952 amendment to its certificate of incorporation.
- The amendment (and an identical legend printed on each preferred stock certificate) provided that holders were entitled to a fixed yearly dividend of $0.50 per share, payable semiannually, and that Constantin “shall be bound to pay” the dividend “but only out of the net profits of the Company.”
- The charter and certificate legend also stated that the dividend was “cumulative,” that preferred holders had no voting rights, and that the preferred stock was “redeemable on and after January 2nd, 1955, at Ten dollars and fifty cents ($10.50) per share.”
- Substantial blocks of the preferred stock were held by multiple holders, including R.P. Holding Corp., Charles Denby, Continental Bank & Trust Company (as receiver for Inland Empire Insurance Co.), and Royal American Insurance Co. (which did not appear and was defaulted).
- Ownership of large blocks changed hands through a series of transfers among insurance-related entities and other corporations; Denby separately acquired a block and later sold a portion back to Constantin, leaving him with fewer shares.
- A dispute arose over Constantin’s obligations to pay dividends that had not been paid and over the effect of the redemption language after January 2, 1955.
- After a federal suit involving nonpayment of a declared dividend, Constantin filed this declaratory judgment action in the New Jersey Superior Court, Chancery Division, seeking a determination of its obligations and the preferred holders’ rights under the charter and certificate terms.

## Issues

1. Whether the charter/certificate language stating Constantin “shall be bound to pay” a fixed dividend “but only out of the net profits of the Company” creates an enforceable obligation to pay dividends when net profits exist, rather than leaving payment to corporate discretion.
2. Whether the “cumulative” dividend provision requires unpaid dividends to accrue as arrears and to be satisfied from later net profits before distributions to junior equity.
3. Whether the clause that the preferred stock is “redeemable on and after January 2, 1955” at $10.50 per share gives preferred holders a right to compel redemption, or instead gives only the corporation a right to redeem.
4. If redemption is elected by the corporation, whether accrued but unpaid cumulative dividends must be paid or provided for in connection with redemption.

## Decision

- The court entered declaratory relief construing the preferred stock provisions as binding contractual terms contained in the charter and repeated on the face of the certificates.
- The court held that the dividend provision imposed a duty to pay the fixed dividend when net profits are available, because the instruments stated the company “shall be bound to pay,” while limiting the source of payment to net profits.
- The court held that “cumulative” means unpaid dividends accrue as arrears and carry forward; when net profits exist, the preferred holders are entitled to receive accumulated arrears before any dividends or comparable distributions may be made to common shareholders.
- The court construed the “redeemable on and after January 2, 1955” clause as making the stock callable at the corporation’s election, not as giving holders a unilateral right to demand redemption at $10.50 per share.
- The court indicated that redemption, if undertaken, must be accomplished in a manner consistent with the preferred holders’ accumulated dividend rights; redemption could not be used to eliminate accrued arrears without payment or adequate provision for them.

## Legal Principles

- A corporation’s certificate of incorporation and the terms printed on stock certificates operate as a contract between the corporation and the shareholders concerning the rights attached to the shares.
- A “cumulative” preferred dividend provision causes unpaid dividends to accrue as arrears and establishes payment priority over junior equity when funds legally available for dividends exist.
- Language providing dividends are payable “only out of the net profits” limits the source of payment, but does not convert a stated obligation (“shall be bound to pay”) into a purely discretionary choice once net profits are available.
- A clause stating shares are “redeemable on and after” a stated date at a stated price generally grants the issuer a right to redeem (a call feature), absent clear language granting holders a right to require redemption.
- When a corporation elects to redeem callable preferred shares, the redemption must be carried out consistently with the share contract, including any accumulated rights to unpaid cumulative dividends.

## Conclusion

The Chancery Division declared that Constantin’s preferred stock terms were enforceable as written: the fixed $0.50 dividend was cumulative and must be paid from net profits when available, creating arrears that take priority over junior equity, while the “redeemable on and after January 2, 1955” language gave Constantin an option to redeem rather than granting holders a right to force redemption, and any redemption had to respect accumulated dividend rights.


L.L. Constantin & Co. v. R.P. Holding Corp., 153 A.2d 378, 56 N.J. Super. 411 (1959)