Logdon v DPP [1976] Crim LR 121

Facts

  • The defendant displayed what appeared to be a functional firearm to the victim, pointing it at them allegedly as a practical joke.
  • The victim experienced fear and distress, apprehending immediate violence.
  • The defendant subsequently revealed that the gun was a replica and not real.
  • The defendant was convicted of assault by the lower court.
  • On appeal, the defendant argued that there was no intent to physically harm the victim, challenging the conviction on the basis of lacking the necessary mens rea for assault.

Issues

  1. Whether the offense of assault requires an intention to carry out threatened violence, or whether it is sufficient for the defendant to intend or be reckless as to causing the victim to apprehend immediate unlawful force.
  2. Whether the victim’s reasonable apprehension of imminent violence, regardless of the defendant’s intent to use force, fulfills the legal requirements for assault.

Decision

  • The Divisional Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the conviction for assault.
  • The court confirmed that it is not necessary to show an intent to execute the threat; it is sufficient that the defendant intentionally or recklessly caused the victim to apprehend immediate unlawful force.

Legal Principles

  • Assault is committed where the defendant intentionally or recklessly causes another person to apprehend the immediate application of unlawful force.
  • It is not necessary for the prosecution to prove that the defendant intended to carry out the threat of violence, only that they intended or were reckless as to causing apprehension of such violence.
  • The victim’s apprehension of unlawful force must be reasonable under the circumstances.
  • The court distinguished this principle from situations where words or context negate the apprehension of violence, such as in Tuberville v Savage, where words made clear that violence would not be used.

Conclusion

The court in Logdon v DPP clarified that for common assault, the mens rea is satisfied by the defendant’s intention or recklessness in causing the victim to apprehend immediate unlawful force; there is no requirement that the defendant intended to actually inflict harm, solidifying the focus on the victim’s reasonable apprehension rather than the defendant’s ultimate intentions.

The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising. This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.
No resources available.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of May 2025. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

All-in-one Learning Platform

Everything you need to master your assessments and job tests in one place

  • Comprehensive Content

    Access thousands of fully explained questions and cases across multiple subjects

  • Visual Learning

    Understand complex concepts with intuitive diagrams and flowcharts

  • Focused Practice

    Prepare for assessments with targeted practice materials and expert guidance

  • Personalized Learning

    Track your progress and focus on areas where you need improvement

  • Affordable Access

    Get quality educational resources at a fraction of traditional costs

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal