## Facts

- The plaintiff and defendant entered into a contract for the sale of land.
- Before the sale transaction was completed, the defendant (vendor) died.
- This raised issues regarding the status of the property and the respective rights of the parties.
- The estate of the deceased vendor was required to consider its obligations concerning completion of the contract and transfer of title.

## Issues

1. Whether a vendor, upon entering a binding contract of sale for land, holds the estate on a constructive trust for the purchaser.
2. Whether the death of the vendor before completion affects the purchaser’s equitable interest or the obligation to complete the transfer.

## Decision

- The court held that from the moment a binding contract for the sale of land is formed, the vendor holds the property on a constructive trust for the purchaser.
- The vendor’s death did not extinguish the purchaser’s equitable interest; the vendor’s estate was still obligated to complete the sale and transfer legal title.
- The constructive trust arises automatically upon contract formation, regardless of the parties' intentions.

## Legal Principles

- Upon formation of a binding contract to sell land, equity treats the purchaser as the equitable owner.
- The vendor holds the property as trustee for the purchaser, owing fiduciary duties including maintenance and accounting for any income until legal title passes.
- The equitable interest protects the purchaser from risks such as the vendor's insolvency or death during the period between contract and completion.
- The doctrine restricts the vendor from dealing with the property in ways that could prejudice the purchaser’s interest and affects the rights of third parties such as creditors and mortgagees.

## Conclusion

Lysaght v Edwards confirmed that a vendor of land, once a binding contract is in place, holds the property on constructive trust for the purchaser, who thereby acquires an equitable interest protected until formal completion, irrespective of the vendor’s death or insolvency. This principle remains fundamental in English property law for safeguarding purchasers’ rights in land transactions.

Lysaght v Edwards [1876] 2 Ch D 499