M v Home Office [1994] 1 AC 377

Facts

  • "M," a citizen of Zaire (now the Democratic Republic of Congo), arrived in the UK seeking asylum.
  • M was interviewed by immigration staff, and the Home Secretary, Kenneth Baker, ordered M's removal before a judicial review of the asylum decision could be conducted.
  • The High Court issued an order halting M’s removal, but the Home Secretary, via staff, disregarded the court's order and proceeded with the removal.
  • The courts later found that the Home Secretary had disobeyed the High Court’s instruction.

Issues

  1. Whether a government minister, specifically the Home Secretary, could be held personally liable for contempt of court for disobeying a court order while acting in an official capacity.
  2. Whether government ministers are legally required to comply with court orders and are subject to legal consequences for non-compliance.

Decision

  • The House of Lords held that government ministers must comply with the law and can be found in contempt of court for disobeying court orders, even when acting on behalf of the state.
  • The argument that ministers are immune from legal sanction for ignoring court directions was rejected.
  • The decision confirmed the courts' authority to enforce their orders against the government.

Legal Principles

  • The case reaffirmed the rule of law: all individuals and bodies, including government officials, are subject to the law and court authority.
  • Ministerial responsibility exists for compliance with legal and judicial requirements, regardless of status or function.
  • Courts maintain the power to ensure enforcement of their rulings against the executive to protect individual rights and prevent abuse of power.
  • The ruling developed principles from Factortame, confirming that legal accountability extends to ministers in cases of direct disobedience of court orders.

Conclusion

M v Home Office [1994] 1 AC 377 is a foundational decision for UK constitutional law, confirming that government ministers are not above the law and are subject to court enforcement for non-compliance. The case firmly established ministerial responsibility, judicial review, and the fundamental authority of the courts over executive action.

The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising. This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.
No resources available.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of May 2025. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

All-in-one Learning Platform

Everything you need to master your assessments and job tests in one place

  • Comprehensive Content

    Access thousands of fully explained questions and cases across multiple subjects

  • Visual Learning

    Understand complex concepts with intuitive diagrams and flowcharts

  • Focused Practice

    Prepare for assessments with targeted practice materials and expert guidance

  • Personalized Learning

    Track your progress and focus on areas where you need improvement

  • Affordable Access

    Get quality educational resources at a fraction of traditional costs

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal