## Facts

- Maritime International Nominees Establishment (MINE) and the Republic of Guinea entered into a joint-venture arrangement connected to a bauxite project.
- Their agreement provided that disputes would be resolved by arbitration before the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID).
- A dispute later arose between the parties concerning the joint venture.
- Despite the ICSID arbitration agreement, MINE initiated arbitration before the American Arbitration Association (AAA).
- The AAA proceedings resulted in an arbitral award in MINE’s favor.
- MINE sought recognition and enforcement of the AAA award in courts of multiple countries, including Switzerland.
- In addition to pursuing enforcement of the AAA award, MINE also commenced arbitration proceedings before ICSID concerning the same dispute.
- In the ICSID case, the tribunal issued an interim award ordering MINE to cease proceedings outside the ICSID arbitration.
- After the interim award, MINE sought relief from a Swiss court in connection with its enforcement efforts, while Guinea opposed Swiss court assistance on the ground that the parties had agreed to ICSID and that ICSID proceedings were pending.

## Issues

1. Does the parties’ agreement to arbitrate disputes before ICSID, together with the pendency of ICSID proceedings, bar or justify refusal of Swiss court assistance to recognize or enforce an AAA award arising from the same dispute?
2. May a Swiss court decline to aid enforcement measures that would conflict with an ICSID tribunal’s interim award directing a party to stop non-ICSID proceedings?

## Decision

- The Geneva Tribunal of First Instance refused to assist MINE in enforcing the AAA award in Switzerland.
- The court treated the ICSID arbitration agreement as controlling for disputes covered by it and declined to give effect in Switzerland to an award rendered through a different arbitral forum.
- In refusing assistance, the court took into account the ongoing ICSID arbitration and the ICSID tribunal’s interim award directing MINE to discontinue proceedings outside ICSID.

## Legal Principles

- Where parties have agreed that covered disputes must be decided by ICSID arbitration, a national court may refuse to recognize or enforce a non-ICSID award that results from arbitral proceedings not contemplated by the parties’ agreement.
- Under recognition-and-enforcement principles reflected in the New York Convention, enforcement may be denied when the arbitral procedure or forum did not conform to the parties’ arbitration agreement (including when the parties selected a different arbitral institution).
- When an ICSID proceeding is pending and the ICSID tribunal has issued an interim award addressing parallel litigation or enforcement activity, a national court may decline to provide assistance that would make the interim award ineffective as between the parties.

## Conclusion

The Swiss Tribunal of First Instance rejected MINE’s attempt to obtain Swiss enforcement help for an AAA award because the parties had agreed to ICSID arbitration for the dispute, ICSID proceedings were underway, and the ICSID tribunal had issued an interim award directing MINE to stop pursuing remedies outside the ICSID case.


Maritime Int'l Nominees Establishment v. Guinea, 1 Foreign Inv. L. J. 383 (1986)