Mexfield Housing Co-operative Ltd v Berrisford [2012] 1 AC 955

Facts

  • Mrs. Berrisford occupied a property under an agreement with Mexfield Housing Cooperative Ltd.
  • The agreement provided for weekly rent and allowed Mexfield to end the arrangement with notice but lacked a fixed end date.
  • Mexfield sought possession of the property, contending the agreement was not a valid lease due to its uncertain duration.

Issues

  1. Whether an agreement lacking a fixed term constitutes a valid lease at common law.
  2. Whether the absence of a definite end date renders the tenancy invalid under established legal principles.
  3. Whether, in cases of uncertainty, a lease to an individual can be construed as a 90-year lease terminable by notice.
  4. Whether the distinction between uncertainty due to external events and uncertainty from notice provisions affects the lease's validity.

Decision

  • The Supreme Court ruled the agreement was a valid lease, applying the rule from Prudential Assurance Co Ltd v London Residuary Body [1992] 2 AC 386.
  • The Court held that, in such cases, the lease takes effect as a 90-year lease terminable by notice under common law if the tenant is an individual.
  • The Court distinguished the case from Lace v Chantler [1944] KB 368, stating that uncertainty depending on parties' power to give notice differs from uncertainty based on an external event.
  • The previous approach strictly invalidating leases with uncertain terms was relaxed, especially for modern housing agreements.

Legal Principles

  • Leases must generally have certainty of term to be valid at common law.
  • Where a lease to an individual contains uncertain duration but either party may end it by notice, the lease may be construed as a determinable 90-year term.
  • The Prudential rule is not applicable to leases to companies or to arrangements where only the tenant may end the agreement.
  • The parties’ intention to create a lease is assessed objectively, considering the agreement’s terms and context.
  • The Mexfield rule does not apply where the agreement specifically states it is not intended to create a lease.

Conclusion

Mexfield Housing Co-operative Ltd v Berrisford significantly shifted the legal approach to leases with uncertain terms by allowing courts to treat certain indeterminate agreements as 90-year leases terminable by notice, thereby providing greater security for individual tenants and requiring careful examination of the agreement's intent and wording.

The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising. This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.
No resources available.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of May 2025. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

All-in-one Learning Platform

Everything you need to master your assessments and job tests in one place

  • Comprehensive Content

    Access thousands of fully explained questions and cases across multiple subjects

  • Visual Learning

    Understand complex concepts with intuitive diagrams and flowcharts

  • Focused Practice

    Prepare for assessments with targeted practice materials and expert guidance

  • Personalized Learning

    Track your progress and focus on areas where you need improvement

  • Affordable Access

    Get quality educational resources at a fraction of traditional costs

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal