## Facts

- Eddy Arias received three pager messages on September 5, 1997, and left his apartment building each time to use a phone because his apartment had no telephone.
- After the third page, Arias was attacked at the bottom of an interior stairway by two masked men, each armed with a handgun.
- Arias broke free, ran upstairs toward his apartment, and was shot in the back by Gregory Ellis.
- For purposes of review, the court accepted that Antoine Markee Mitchell was the second assailant and that Ellis fired the shot.
- The prosecution’s theory was that the assailants intended to kill Arias, not merely rob him.
- The trial court granted judgments of acquittal on attempted first-degree murder, conspiracy to commit first-degree murder, and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon.
- The jury convicted Mitchell of attempted second-degree murder, first-degree assault, conspiracy to commit second-degree murder, conspiracy to commit first-degree assault, and use of a handgun in the commission of a felony.
- After merger of some counts for sentencing, Mitchell received an aggregate 46-year sentence, including 13 years for conspiracy to commit second-degree murder.

## Issues

1. Whether conspiracy to commit second-degree murder is a cognizable offense under Maryland law.
2. Whether conspiracy to commit murder can be proved by implied malice, or instead requires proof of a specific intent to kill at the time of the agreement.
3. How deliberation and premeditation concepts used to classify completed murder offenses relate to the mens rea required for conspiracy.

## Decision

- The Court of Appeals of Maryland granted certiorari to decide whether conspiracy to commit second-degree murder is a crime in Maryland.
- The court held that conspiracy liability centers on the agreement and the defendant’s intent at the time the agreement is formed.
- The court rejected the categorical claim that any agreement to kill necessarily entails premeditation and deliberation.
- The court held that conspiracy to commit murder requires proof of a specific intent to kill and cannot rest on implied-malice theories.
- Applying these principles, the court reversed the conspiracy to commit second-degree murder conviction and remanded for further proceedings consistent with its opinion.

## Legal Principles

- Conspiracy is an inchoate offense focused on (1) an agreement to commit an unlawful act and (2) the requisite intent at the time of agreement.
- A conspiracy may be formed without formal expressions of agreement or extended advance planning; concerted action can permit an inference of agreement.
- Conspiracy to commit murder requires proof that the defendant agreed to a killing and did so with a specific intent to cause the victim’s death.
- Implied malice (including depraved-heart type malice sufficient for some second-degree murder convictions) is insufficient to prove conspiracy to commit murder.
- The first-/second-degree murder classification scheme for completed homicides does not transfer mechanically to conspiracy; the controlling inquiry is the conspirators’ intent when they agreed.

## Conclusion

Mitchell clarified that Maryland murder-conspiracy liability turns on a proven agreement to kill coupled with a specific intent to kill, and that implied malice cannot substitute for that intent; it also explained that an agreement may arise without extensive planning, but degree-of-murder concepts cannot be applied to conspiracy without accounting for conspiracy’s agreement-based mens rea.


Mitchell v. State, 363 Md. 130, 767 A.2d 844 (Md. 2001)