Learning Outcomes
After reading this article, you will be able to identify the scope and limits of First Amendment freedoms as tested on the MBE. You will distinguish between protected and unprotected speech, apply the correct scrutiny to content-based and content-neutral regulations, and recognize how the First Amendment interacts with government and private action. You will be able to answer MBE-style questions on these principles with confidence.
MBE Syllabus
For the MBE, you are required to understand the constitutional protections for speech, religion, and assembly, and the limits on government regulation. This article covers:
- The distinction between content-based and content-neutral regulation of speech.
- The categories of unprotected and less-protected speech (e.g., obscenity, defamation, commercial speech).
- The requirements for valid time, place, and manner restrictions.
- The difference between government action and private conduct for First Amendment purposes.
- The standards for laws affecting freedom of religion (Establishment and Free Exercise Clauses).
- The rules for prior restraints, vagueness, and overbreadth.
- The scrutiny applied to regulations of expressive conduct and commercial speech.
Test Your Knowledge
Attempt these questions before reading this article. If you find some difficult or cannot remember the answers, remember to look more closely at that area during your revision.
-
Which of the following is most likely to be struck down as a violation of the First Amendment?
- A law banning all speech in a public park between 10 p.m. and 6 a.m.
- A law prohibiting speech critical of government officials.
- A law requiring permits for parades, regardless of message.
- A law banning loudspeakers within 100 feet of a hospital.
-
Which category of speech receives no First Amendment protection?
- Political speech.
- Commercial speech that is false or misleading.
- Artistic expression.
- Speech critical of the judiciary.
-
A city bans all demonstrations in front of government buildings, regardless of topic. What level of scrutiny applies?
- Strict scrutiny.
- Rational basis.
- Intermediate scrutiny (time, place, and manner).
- No scrutiny; the ban is valid.
-
The Free Exercise Clause most strongly protects which of the following?
- Religious belief.
- All conduct motivated by religion.
- Refusal to pay taxes for religious reasons.
- Use of illegal drugs in religious ceremonies, if the law is neutral.
Introduction
The First Amendment protects freedom of speech, religion, press, assembly, and petition. These rights are not absolute. The government may regulate speech and religion under certain conditions, but the standards for such regulation depend on the type of speech, the nature of the regulation, and whether government or private action is involved.
Types of Speech and Levels of Protection
Speech is generally protected unless it falls into a category that receives less or no protection. The main categories are:
- Fully protected speech: Political, artistic, and scientific expression.
- Less-protected speech: Commercial speech, which is protected unless false or misleading.
- Unprotected speech: Obscenity, true threats, incitement to imminent lawless action, and fighting words.
Key Term: Content-Based Regulation
A law that restricts speech because of the topic or message expressed. Subject to strict scrutiny and usually invalid unless necessary to achieve a compelling government interest.Key Term: Content-Neutral Regulation
A law that regulates speech without regard to its content, typically as to time, place, or manner. Subject to intermediate scrutiny and upheld if narrowly tailored to serve a significant government interest and leaves open ample alternative channels.Key Term: Prior Restraint
A government action that prohibits speech before it occurs. Strongly disfavored and almost always unconstitutional unless justified by a compelling interest and accompanied by strict procedural safeguards.Key Term: Overbreadth
A law is overbroad if it prohibits a substantial amount of protected speech along with unprotected speech. Such laws are invalid under the First Amendment.Key Term: Vagueness
A law is vague if persons of common intelligence must guess at its meaning. Vague laws violate due process and the First Amendment.Key Term: State Action
Conduct by government or its agents. The First Amendment restricts only state action, not purely private conduct, except in rare cases where private actors perform functions traditionally reserved to the state.
Content-Based vs. Content-Neutral Regulation
If a law targets speech because of its message, it is content-based and must satisfy strict scrutiny: it must be necessary to achieve a compelling government interest and be narrowly tailored. Most content-based laws are struck down.
If a law regulates speech without regard to content (e.g., time, place, and manner), it is content-neutral and must satisfy intermediate scrutiny: it must be narrowly tailored to serve a significant government interest and leave open ample alternative channels for communication.
Unprotected and Less-Protected Speech
Certain types of speech are not protected:
- Obscenity: Material that appeals to the prurient interest, is patently offensive, and lacks serious value, as judged by community and national standards.
- Incitement: Advocacy intended and likely to produce imminent lawless action.
- Fighting words: Personally abusive epithets likely to provoke an immediate violent response.
- True threats: Statements meant to communicate a serious intent to commit unlawful violence.
- Defamation: False statements of fact damaging to reputation, subject to special rules for public figures and officials.
Commercial speech is protected if truthful and about lawful activity. However, false or misleading commercial speech may be prohibited entirely.
Time, Place, and Manner Restrictions
The government may impose reasonable time, place, and manner restrictions on speech in public forums if the regulation is content-neutral, serves a significant government interest, is narrowly tailored, and leaves open alternative channels for communication.
Prior Restraints, Vagueness, and Overbreadth
Prior restraints are almost always invalid. Laws regulating speech must be clear and not prohibit more speech than necessary. Overbroad or vague laws are unconstitutional.
Freedom of Religion
The First Amendment also protects religious freedom through the Establishment and Free Exercise Clauses.
- Establishment Clause: Government may not endorse or support religion. Laws must have a secular purpose, not advance or inhibit religion, and avoid excessive entanglement.
- Free Exercise Clause: Government may not prohibit religious belief. Neutral, generally applicable laws may be enforced even if they incidentally burden religious practice. Laws targeting religion or religious conduct are subject to strict scrutiny.
Government vs. Private Action
The First Amendment restricts only government action. Private conduct is not subject to the First Amendment unless the private actor is performing a function traditionally reserved to the state.
Worked Example 1.1
A city passes a law banning all demonstrations critical of government policy in public parks. Is this law likely to be upheld?
Answer: No. The law is content-based because it targets speech based on its message. It must satisfy strict scrutiny, which it will almost never do. The law is unconstitutional.
Worked Example 1.2
A state requires permits for all parades, regardless of the message, and limits them to certain hours to reduce traffic. Is this valid?
Answer: Yes, if the permit system is content-neutral, serves a significant interest (traffic control), is narrowly tailored, and leaves open alternative channels. This is a valid time, place, and manner restriction.
Worked Example 1.3
A religious group challenges a neutral law banning all use of peyote, claiming a right to use it in ceremonies. Does the Free Exercise Clause protect them?
Answer: No. If the law is neutral and generally applicable, it may be enforced even if it incidentally burdens religious practice. The Free Exercise Clause does not require religious exemptions from such laws.
Exam Warning
Laws that appear neutral but are applied in a way that targets specific viewpoints are treated as content-based and are subject to strict scrutiny. Always check both the text and application of the law.
Revision Tip
On the MBE, always identify whether the regulation is content-based or content-neutral before choosing the level of scrutiny. This is the key to most First Amendment questions.
Key Point Checklist
This article has covered the following key knowledge points:
- The First Amendment protects speech, religion, press, assembly, and petition, but not all speech is protected.
- Content-based regulations are subject to strict scrutiny and are usually invalid.
- Content-neutral time, place, and manner restrictions are subject to intermediate scrutiny.
- Unprotected speech includes obscenity, incitement, fighting words, and true threats.
- Commercial speech is protected if truthful and about lawful activity; false or misleading commercial speech is not protected.
- Prior restraints, vague, and overbroad laws are almost always unconstitutional.
- The First Amendment applies only to government action, not private conduct.
- The Establishment Clause prohibits government endorsement of religion; the Free Exercise Clause protects religious belief but not all religious conduct.
- Neutral, generally applicable laws may be enforced even if they incidentally burden religious practice.
Key Terms and Concepts
- Content-Based Regulation
- Content-Neutral Regulation
- Prior Restraint
- Overbreadth
- Vagueness
- State Action