Individual rights - Freedom of the press

Learning Outcomes

After reading this article, you will be able to identify the constitutional protections for freedom of the press under the First Amendment, distinguish between content-based and content-neutral regulations, explain the rules on prior restraints, and analyze when government restrictions or penalties on press activity are likely to be upheld or struck down. You will also be able to apply these principles to MBE-style questions.

MBE Syllabus

For the MBE, you are required to understand the scope and limits of freedom of the press as protected by the First Amendment. This includes:

  • The constitutional basis for freedom of the press and its relationship to freedom of speech.
  • The rules and exceptions regarding prior restraints (including injunctions and gag orders).
  • The distinction between content-based and content-neutral regulation of press activity.
  • The standards for government penalties on publication of truthful information.
  • The press’s right of access to trials and government proceedings.
  • The absence of special privileges for the press (e.g., no constitutional reporter’s privilege).
  • The regulation of broadcast and print media.
  • The application of defamation and privacy law to the press.

Test Your Knowledge

Attempt these questions before reading this article. If you find some difficult or cannot remember the answers, remember to look more closely at that area during your revision.

  1. Which of the following is most likely to be found unconstitutional as a prior restraint on the press?
    1. A law imposing civil damages for publishing false statements about a public figure.
    2. An injunction prohibiting a newspaper from publishing lawfully obtained, truthful information about a matter of public concern.
    3. A requirement that newspapers register with the state before publishing.
    4. A tax on the sale of newspapers.
  2. The government may constitutionally punish the press for publishing:
    1. Truthful information obtained from public records.
    2. Lawfully obtained information about a matter of public significance.
    3. Obscene material.
    4. Accurate reporting of a criminal trial.
  3. Which statement about the press’s right of access to government proceedings is correct?
    1. The press has an absolute right to attend all government meetings.
    2. The press has no greater right of access than the general public.
    3. The press may be excluded from all criminal trials.
    4. The press may require government officials to answer questions.

Introduction

Freedom of the press is a core protection under the First Amendment, ensuring that government cannot censor or unduly restrict the publication of news, opinions, or information. However, this right is not absolute. Courts have developed specific rules for when the government may regulate, restrain, or penalize press activity. Understanding these rules is essential for answering MBE questions on individual rights.

The First Amendment and the Press

The First Amendment prohibits laws "abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press." The press is protected as a speaker, but does not receive greater rights than individuals. The government may not single out the press for special burdens or privileges.

Key Term: Freedom of the Press The First Amendment right preventing government from censoring or punishing publication of news, information, or opinion, subject to limited exceptions.

Prior Restraints

A prior restraint is a government action that prohibits speech or publication before it occurs, such as an injunction or gag order.

Key Term: Prior Restraint Any official government restriction on speech or publication before it takes place, including court orders or licensing schemes.

Prior restraints are highly disfavored and almost always unconstitutional. The government must show a compelling interest and that no less restrictive means are available. Even in national security cases, the burden is extremely high.

Content-Based vs. Content-Neutral Regulation

Government regulation of the press may be content-based (targeting the subject or viewpoint) or content-neutral (regulating time, place, or manner).

Key Term: Content-Based Regulation A law or order that restricts speech or publication because of the topic or viewpoint expressed.

Content-based regulations are subject to strict scrutiny and are rarely upheld. Content-neutral regulations are reviewed under intermediate scrutiny and may be allowed if they are narrowly tailored to serve a significant government interest and leave open alternative channels for communication.

Publication of Truthful Information

The government generally cannot punish the press for publishing truthful, lawfully obtained information about a matter of public concern, unless it can show a need of the highest order (e.g., to protect national security or a compelling interest).

Key Term: Lawfully Obtained Information Information acquired by the press without violating the law, even if the source obtained it unlawfully.

Access to Trials and Government Proceedings

The press has a qualified right of access to criminal trials and some government proceedings, but this right is not absolute. The government may close proceedings if it shows an overriding interest and closure is narrowly tailored.

Key Term: Qualified Right of Access The press’s limited right to attend criminal trials and certain government proceedings, subject to exceptions for compelling interests.

No Special Privileges for the Press

The press has no constitutional privilege to refuse to testify before a grand jury or to protect confidential sources. The First Amendment does not provide a reporter’s privilege.

Regulation of Broadcast and Print Media

Broadcast media (radio and television) may be subject to greater regulation due to spectrum scarcity. Print media (newspapers, magazines) and the internet receive the highest level of protection.

Defamation and Privacy Law

The press may be liable for defamation or invasion of privacy, but the First Amendment limits liability when the subject is a public official, public figure, or matter of public concern. Actual malice must be shown for liability in these cases.

Worked Example 1.1

A court issues an injunction prohibiting a newspaper from publishing the name of a government official accused of misconduct, based on a state law protecting the privacy of officials. The newspaper obtained the information lawfully.

Answer: The injunction is an unconstitutional prior restraint. The government cannot prevent publication of lawfully obtained, truthful information about a matter of public concern unless it shows a compelling interest and no less restrictive means. Protecting official privacy is not sufficient to justify a prior restraint.

Worked Example 1.2

A state passes a law requiring all newspapers to submit articles to a government board for approval before publication. A newspaper challenges the law.

Answer: The law is an unconstitutional prior restraint. Mandatory pre-publication approval is almost never allowed under the First Amendment.

Worked Example 1.3

A journalist refuses to reveal a confidential source before a grand jury and is held in contempt. She claims a First Amendment privilege.

Answer: The claim fails. The First Amendment does not provide a constitutional reporter’s privilege to refuse to testify before a grand jury.

Exam Warning

Government attempts to prevent publication (prior restraints) are almost always unconstitutional, even if the information is sensitive or embarrassing. Do not assume that national security or privacy concerns will justify a prior restraint unless the facts show an extraordinary threat.

Revision Tip

Remember: The press has no greater or lesser rights than other speakers. Focus on whether the regulation is content-based, and whether it is a prior restraint or a penalty after publication.

Key Point Checklist

This article has covered the following key knowledge points:

  • The First Amendment protects freedom of the press, but not absolutely.
  • Prior restraints (e.g., injunctions, gag orders) are almost always unconstitutional.
  • Content-based regulation of the press is subject to strict scrutiny.
  • The government cannot punish publication of lawfully obtained, truthful information about matters of public concern, except in rare cases.
  • The press has a qualified right of access to criminal trials and some government proceedings.
  • There is no constitutional privilege for reporters to refuse to testify or protect sources.
  • Broadcast media may be regulated more than print or internet media.
  • Defamation and privacy claims against the press are limited by the First Amendment when public officials, public figures, or matters of public concern are involved.

Key Terms and Concepts

  • Freedom of the Press
  • Prior Restraint
  • Content-Based Regulation
  • Lawfully Obtained Information
  • Qualified Right of Access
The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising. This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.
No resources available.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
AdaptiBar
One-time Fee
$395
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
BarPrepHero
One-time Fee
$299
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350
Quimbee
One-time Fee
$1,199

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of May 2025. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

All-in-one Learning Platform

Everything you need to master your assessments and job tests in one place

  • Comprehensive Content

    Access thousands of fully explained questions and cases across multiple subjects

  • Visual Learning

    Understand complex concepts with intuitive diagrams and flowcharts

  • Focused Practice

    Prepare for assessments with targeted practice materials and expert guidance

  • Personalized Learning

    Track your progress and focus on areas where you need improvement

  • Affordable Access

    Get quality educational resources at a fraction of traditional costs

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal