Individual rights - Takings

Learning Outcomes

After reading this article, you will be able to identify when government action constitutes a taking of private property under the Fifth Amendment, distinguish between physical and regulatory takings, explain the requirements for public use and just compensation, and apply these principles to MBE-style questions.

MBE Syllabus

For MBE, you are required to understand the constitutional limits on government power to take private property. This includes knowing when compensation is required, the difference between types of takings, and the standards for public use. You should be able to:

  • Recognize the scope and application of the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment.
  • Distinguish between physical occupation, regulatory takings, and permissible regulation.
  • Identify the requirements for public use and just compensation.
  • Apply the rules to scenarios involving land use, zoning, and government regulation.

Test Your Knowledge

Attempt these questions before reading this article. If you find some difficult or cannot remember the answers, remember to look more closely at that area during your revision.

  1. Which of the following is most likely a taking requiring just compensation?

    • (A) A city rezones land to prohibit commercial use, reducing its value by 30%.
    • (B) The government requires a landowner to allow a permanent cable box on her property.
    • (C) A state bans all billboards along highways, reducing advertising revenue.
    • (D) A city imposes a tax on rental income.
  2. The Takings Clause requires:

    • (A) Compensation only for physical seizures of land.
    • (B) Compensation for any government regulation that reduces property value.
    • (C) Compensation when private property is taken for public use.
    • (D) Compensation only if the owner is deprived of all economic use.
  3. Which scenario is least likely to be considered a taking?

    • (A) The government floods private land for a temporary period.
    • (B) A city requires developers to dedicate land for a public park as a permit condition.
    • (C) A state prohibits construction on wetlands, leaving some economic use.
    • (D) The government builds a road across private land.

Introduction

The Fifth Amendment prohibits the government from taking private property for public use without just compensation. This protection, known as the Takings Clause, applies to both federal and state governments. Understanding when government action amounts to a "taking" is essential for the MBE, as not all government regulation or interference with property triggers compensation.

Key Term: Takings Clause The constitutional provision that prohibits the government from taking private property for public use without providing just compensation.

The Scope of the Takings Clause

The Takings Clause applies when the government physically appropriates or occupies private property, or when regulation goes so far that it is equivalent to a taking. Not every regulation or decrease in property value is a taking.

Physical Takings

A physical taking occurs when the government permanently occupies or seizes private property. This includes direct appropriation (e.g., condemnation for a highway) or permanent physical occupation (e.g., requiring installation of equipment on private land).

Key Term: Physical Taking Government action that results in a permanent physical occupation or appropriation of private property, requiring compensation.

Regulatory Takings

A regulatory taking occurs when a government regulation limits the use of property so severely that it is equivalent to a physical appropriation. However, most regulations that merely reduce property value are not takings. A regulation is a taking if it deprives the owner of all economically viable use, or if it imposes conditions that lack a close connection ("nexus" and "rough proportionality") to the impact of the proposed development.

Key Term: Regulatory Taking A government regulation that limits property use so extensively that it is functionally equivalent to a physical taking, requiring compensation.

Public Use Requirement

The government may only take property for "public use." This is interpreted broadly—any purpose that serves a legitimate public objective, including economic development, qualifies.

Key Term: Public Use Any purpose that serves a legitimate public objective, including economic development, infrastructure, or public benefit.

Just Compensation

When a taking occurs, the government must pay "just compensation," typically the fair market value of the property at the time of the taking.

Key Term: Just Compensation The fair market value of property at the time of the taking, which must be paid to the owner when property is taken for public use.

Regulatory Action vs. Taking

Not all government action that affects property is a taking. Zoning, land-use regulations, and restrictions that leave some economically viable use are generally not takings. A regulation that eliminates all economic use, or that imposes conditions unrelated to the development's impact, may be a taking.

Worked Example 1.1

A city passes an ordinance prohibiting all construction on a parcel of land to preserve wildlife habitat. The owner cannot build, sell, or lease the land for any purpose.

Answer: This is likely a taking. The regulation deprives the owner of all economically viable use, so the city must pay just compensation.

Worked Example 1.2

A state requires landowners to allow a utility company to install permanent cable boxes on their property.

Answer: This is a physical taking. Permanent physical occupation, even if minor, requires compensation.

Worked Example 1.3

A city rezones a residential area to prohibit commercial use, reducing property values by 25%, but owners can still live in or rent their homes.

Answer: This is not a taking. The regulation leaves economically viable use, so no compensation is required.

Exam Warning

On the MBE, not every reduction in property value is a taking. Look for permanent physical occupation or regulations that leave no viable use. Temporary restrictions or partial loss of value usually do not require compensation.

Public Use and Economic Development

The Supreme Court interprets "public use" broadly. Taking property for economic development or to transfer to another private party for a public benefit can satisfy the requirement, as long as the taking serves a legitimate public purpose.

Revision Tip

Remember: "Public use" includes roads, schools, utilities, and even economic development projects. The government does not need to keep the property for public ownership.

Temporary Takings and Emergencies

Temporary government occupation or regulation may be a taking if it denies all use for a significant period. However, actions taken during emergencies (e.g., wartime destruction to prevent enemy use) are less likely to be considered takings.

Exactions and Permit Conditions

When the government conditions development approval on the dedication of land or money, the condition must have a close connection (nexus) and be roughly proportional to the impact of the proposed development. Otherwise, it may be a taking.

Key Term: Exaction A condition imposed by the government on a land-use permit, requiring dedication of land or payment, which must be related and proportional to the development's impact.

Summary

  • The Takings Clause prohibits the government from taking private property for public use without just compensation.
  • Physical occupation or appropriation is always a taking.
  • Regulation is a taking only if it deprives the owner of all economic use or imposes unrelated, disproportionate conditions.
  • Public use is interpreted broadly.
  • Just compensation is the fair market value at the time of the taking.

Key Point Checklist

This article has covered the following key knowledge points:

  • The Takings Clause requires compensation for government takings of private property for public use.
  • Physical occupation is always a taking; regulatory takings require loss of all viable use or disproportionate exactions.
  • Public use includes any legitimate public purpose, not just public ownership.
  • Just compensation is the fair market value at the time of the taking.
  • Not all regulations or reductions in value are takings.

Key Terms and Concepts

  • Takings Clause
  • Physical Taking
  • Regulatory Taking
  • Public Use
  • Just Compensation
  • Exaction
The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising. This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.
No resources available.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
AdaptiBar
One-time Fee
$395
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
BarPrepHero
One-time Fee
$299
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350
Quimbee
One-time Fee
$1,199

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of May 2025. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

All-in-one Learning Platform

Everything you need to master your assessments and job tests in one place

  • Comprehensive Content

    Access thousands of fully explained questions and cases across multiple subjects

  • Visual Learning

    Understand complex concepts with intuitive diagrams and flowcharts

  • Focused Practice

    Prepare for assessments with targeted practice materials and expert guidance

  • Personalized Learning

    Track your progress and focus on areas where you need improvement

  • Affordable Access

    Get quality educational resources at a fraction of traditional costs

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal