Jury trials - Requests for and objections to jury instructions

Learning Outcomes

After reading this article, you will understand the rules for requesting and objecting to jury instructions in federal civil trials. You will be able to identify when and how to properly request instructions, how to object to proposed or omitted instructions, and the consequences of failing to object. You will also know how these rules affect error preservation for appeals, ensuring you can answer MBE questions on this topic with confidence.

MBE Syllabus

For MBE, you are required to understand the procedures and requirements for jury instructions in federal civil trials. This includes:

  • The process for requesting jury instructions and the timing requirements.
  • How and when to object to proposed or omitted jury instructions.
  • The effect of failing to object on the ability to raise instructional errors on appeal.
  • The "plain error" exception for unpreserved instructional mistakes.
  • The difference between requesting and objecting to instructions.

Test Your Knowledge

Attempt these questions before reading this article. If you find some difficult or cannot remember the answers, remember to look more closely at that area during your revision.

  1. When must a party object to a proposed jury instruction to preserve the issue for appeal?
  2. If a party submits a proposed instruction but does not object when the court omits it, can the party raise the issue on appeal?
  3. What is the "plain error" rule regarding jury instructions in federal court?
  4. Is it necessary to object to a jury instruction after it is given to the jury, or before?

Introduction

Jury instructions are a critical part of federal civil trials. They guide the jury on the law to apply when deciding the case. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure set out specific procedures for requesting instructions and objecting to those proposed or omitted by the court. Understanding these procedures is essential for preserving issues for appeal and avoiding waiver.

Requesting Jury Instructions

Any party may request specific jury instructions. Requests must be made at the close of evidence or earlier if ordered by the court. If an issue could not reasonably have been anticipated earlier, a party may request an instruction after the close of evidence, but before the jury is charged.

Key Term: Jury Instruction Request A formal written or oral proposal by a party asking the court to include a specific instruction in the jury charge.

Objecting to Jury Instructions

After the court informs the parties of its proposed instructions and how it will rule on their requests, it must give the parties an opportunity to object on the record and outside the jury's presence. Objections must be made before the instructions are given to the jury and before final arguments, unless the party was not informed of the instruction or omission until later.

Key Term: Objection to Jury Instruction A formal statement by a party, on the record, identifying a specific problem with a proposed or omitted jury instruction and stating the grounds for the objection.

Waiver and Preservation of Error

A party who fails to object to a jury instruction or omission as required by the rules generally waives the right to challenge the instruction on appeal. Submitting a proposed instruction alone is not enough; a timely objection must also be made if the court omits the instruction or gives an erroneous one.

Key Term: Waiver of Instructional Error The loss of the right to challenge a jury instruction on appeal due to failure to make a timely and specific objection at trial.

The Plain Error Exception

Even if a party fails to object as required, a court may consider a "plain error" in the instructions if the error affects substantial rights. This is a narrow exception and applies only to obvious errors that seriously affect the fairness or integrity of the proceedings.

Key Term: Plain Error (Jury Instructions) An obvious and serious mistake in a jury instruction that affects substantial rights and may be reviewed on appeal even without a proper objection.

The Process in Practice

The court must inform the parties of its proposed instructions and rulings on their requests before instructing the jury. Parties must then object promptly and specifically, stating the matter objected to and the grounds. Objections made after the jury is charged are generally too late unless the party was not previously informed of the instruction or omission.

Worked Example 1.1

A plaintiff in a federal civil trial submits a proposed instruction on damages. The court does not include the instruction in its proposed charge and does not mention it. The plaintiff does not object before the jury is instructed. After the verdict, the plaintiff appeals, arguing the court erred by omitting the instruction.

Answer: The plaintiff cannot raise the issue on appeal. Submitting a proposed instruction is not enough; the plaintiff was required to object on the record before the instructions were given to the jury. Failure to do so waives the right to challenge the omission.

Worked Example 1.2

A defendant objects to a proposed instruction before the jury is charged, but the court gives the instruction anyway. The defendant does not object again after the instruction is given. Can the defendant raise the issue on appeal?

Answer: Yes. The defendant's timely objection before the instruction was given preserves the issue for appeal. No further objection is required after the instruction is delivered.

Worked Example 1.3

A party fails to object to an erroneous instruction at trial. On appeal, the party argues the instruction was plainly wrong and affected the outcome. What must the appellate court find to consider the error?

Answer: The appellate court may review the instruction only if it finds "plain error"—that is, an obvious and serious error affecting substantial rights. This is a high threshold and rarely met.

Exam Warning

Failing to object to a jury instruction or omission at the time required by the rules almost always waives the issue for appeal. Do not assume that submitting a proposed instruction is enough—an explicit, timely objection is necessary.

Revision Tip

Always remember: objections to jury instructions must be made on the record, outside the jury's presence, and before the instructions are given. Late objections are rarely allowed.

Key Point Checklist

This article has covered the following key knowledge points:

  • Parties must request jury instructions at the close of evidence or earlier if ordered.
  • Objections to proposed or omitted instructions must be made on the record before the jury is charged.
  • Submitting a proposed instruction alone does not preserve error; a timely objection is required.
  • Failure to object as required generally waives the right to challenge the instruction on appeal.
  • The "plain error" exception allows review of unpreserved errors only if they are obvious and affect substantial rights.

Key Terms and Concepts

  • Jury Instruction Request
  • Objection to Jury Instruction
  • Waiver of Instructional Error
  • Plain Error (Jury Instructions)
The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising. This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.
No resources available.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
AdaptiBar
One-time Fee
$395
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
BarPrepHero
One-time Fee
$299
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350
Quimbee
One-time Fee
$1,199

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of May 2025. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

All-in-one Learning Platform

Everything you need to master your assessments and job tests in one place

  • Comprehensive Content

    Access thousands of fully explained questions and cases across multiple subjects

  • Visual Learning

    Understand complex concepts with intuitive diagrams and flowcharts

  • Focused Practice

    Prepare for assessments with targeted practice materials and expert guidance

  • Personalized Learning

    Track your progress and focus on areas where you need improvement

  • Affordable Access

    Get quality educational resources at a fraction of traditional costs

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal