Performance, breach, and discharge - Excuse of conditions

Learning Outcomes

After reading this article, you will be able to identify when a party’s duty to perform under a contract is excused due to the non-occurrence or waiver of a condition. You will understand the distinction between express and implied conditions, the doctrine of substantial performance, and how prevention, waiver, and estoppel can excuse conditions. You will be able to apply these principles to MBE-style questions.

MBE Syllabus

For the MBE, you are required to understand when a party’s contractual obligations may be excused due to the failure, waiver, or prevention of a condition. This includes:

  • Recognizing the difference between express and implied (constructive) conditions.
  • Determining when substantial performance satisfies an implied condition.
  • Identifying when a condition is excused by waiver, estoppel, or prevention by the other party.
  • Applying the doctrine of divisibility and the effect of breach on the duty to perform.
  • Understanding the consequences of the failure or excuse of a condition on contractual duties and remedies.

Test Your Knowledge

Attempt these questions before reading this article. If you find some difficult or cannot remember the answers, remember to look more closely at that area during your revision.

  1. Which of the following best describes an express condition in a contract?
    1. A term implied by law to ensure fairness.
    2. A term stated explicitly in the contract that must occur before a duty arises.
    3. A promise to perform in good faith.
    4. A minor term that can be disregarded.
  2. If a party prevents the occurrence of a condition that benefits them, what is the likely result?
    1. The condition is excused, and the other party’s duty is discharged.
    2. The contract is void for uncertainty.
    3. The condition is enforced strictly.
    4. The contract is automatically terminated.
  3. Under the doctrine of substantial performance, which type of condition may be satisfied by less than complete performance?
    1. Express condition precedent.
    2. Express condition subsequent.
    3. Constructive (implied) condition of exchange.
    4. Condition of satisfaction (aesthetic).

Introduction

A party’s duty to perform under a contract is often subject to the occurrence of a condition. When a condition fails, the duty may be excused, but there are important exceptions and doctrines that may still require performance or provide remedies. Understanding when and how conditions are excused is essential for MBE contract questions.

Key Term: Condition A fact or event, not certain to occur, which must occur before a contractual duty becomes due or is discharged.

Types of Conditions

Conditions can be express (explicitly stated in the contract) or implied/constructive (imposed by law to ensure fairness or effectuate the parties’ intent).

Key Term: Express Condition A condition stated in clear, unambiguous language in the contract, requiring strict compliance for a duty to arise.

Key Term: Implied (Constructive) Condition A condition not expressly stated but inferred by law or the nature of the agreement, often satisfied by substantial performance.

Strict vs. Substantial Performance

Express conditions must be strictly satisfied. If an express condition is not met, the duty subject to that condition does not arise. In contrast, implied (constructive) conditions—such as the constructive condition of exchange in bilateral contracts—may be satisfied by substantial performance, especially in service or construction contracts.

Key Term: Substantial Performance Performance that, while not complete, is close enough to satisfy an implied condition, entitling the performing party to the contract price minus damages for any defects.

Excuse of Conditions

A condition may be excused in several ways:

  • Waiver: The party protected by the condition voluntarily relinquishes the right to insist on its occurrence.
  • Estoppel: If a party indicates they will not insist on a condition and the other party relies, the condition may be excused.
  • Prevention: If a party wrongfully hinders or prevents the occurrence of a condition, the condition is excused.
  • Forfeiture: Courts may excuse a condition to avoid disproportionate forfeiture if the breaching party has acted in good faith.

Key Term: Waiver The intentional and voluntary relinquishment of a known right, such as the right to insist on a condition.

Key Term: Prevention When a party wrongfully interferes with the occurrence of a condition, excusing the condition and making the duty absolute.

Worked Example 1.1

A contract states: “Painter will be paid $10,000 if, and only if, the homeowner is completely satisfied with the work.” Painter completes the job, but the homeowner honestly dislikes the color, even though most people would find it acceptable. Must the homeowner pay?

Answer: No. This is an express condition of personal satisfaction. If the contract involves aesthetic taste, the subjective standard applies. If the homeowner is honestly dissatisfied, the condition is not met, and the duty to pay does not arise.

Worked Example 1.2

Builder contracts to construct a house for Owner for $500,000. Builder completes the house, but uses a slightly different brand of windows than specified, with no impact on value or appearance. Owner refuses to pay, citing noncompliance with the contract.

Answer: Owner must pay, minus any damages for the minor defect. The constructive condition of exchange is satisfied by substantial performance. Minor deviations do not excuse payment, but Owner may recover damages for the difference.

Worked Example 1.3

Seller agrees to sell land to Buyer, “provided Buyer secures financing at 5% or less.” Buyer only obtains a loan at 6% but still wants to proceed. Seller agrees to close the deal. Later, Seller refuses to sell, arguing the condition was not met.

Answer: Seller’s agreement to proceed is a waiver of the express condition. Seller cannot later insist on the condition after waiving it.

Exam Warning

Exam Warning: Do not confuse express conditions (which require strict compliance) with promises or constructive conditions (which may be satisfied by substantial performance). Failure to distinguish these may lead to incorrect answers on the MBE.

Revision Tip

Revision Tip: Always identify whether a term is an express condition, an implied condition, or a promise. This determines the standard of performance and the consequences of non-occurrence.

Key Point Checklist

This article has covered the following key knowledge points:

  • A condition is an event that must occur before a contractual duty arises or is discharged.
  • Express conditions require strict compliance; implied (constructive) conditions may be satisfied by substantial performance.
  • Substantial performance is sufficient for constructive conditions but not for express conditions.
  • Conditions may be excused by waiver, estoppel, or prevention by the other party.
  • If a party wrongfully prevents a condition, the condition is excused and the duty becomes absolute.
  • Waiver is the intentional relinquishment of a known right to insist on a condition.
  • Courts may excuse conditions to avoid disproportionate forfeiture in some cases.

Key Terms and Concepts

  • Condition
  • Express Condition
  • Implied (Constructive) Condition
  • Substantial Performance
  • Waiver
  • Prevention
The answers, solutions, explanations, and written content provided on this page represent PastPaperHero's interpretation of academic material and potential responses to given questions. These are not guaranteed to be the only correct or definitive answers or explanations. Alternative valid responses, interpretations, or approaches may exist. If you believe any content is incorrect, outdated, or could be improved, please get in touch with us and we will review and make necessary amendments if we deem it appropriate. As per our terms and conditions, PastPaperHero shall not be held liable or responsible for any consequences arising. This includes, but is not limited to, incorrect answers in assignments, exams, or any form of testing administered by educational institutions or examination boards, as well as any misunderstandings or misapplications of concepts explained in our written content. Users are responsible for verifying that the methods, procedures, and explanations presented align with those taught in their respective educational settings and with current academic standards. While we strive to provide high-quality, accurate, and up-to-date content, PastPaperHero does not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of our written explanations, nor any specific outcomes in academic understanding or testing, whether formal or informal.
No resources available.

Job & Test Prep on a Budget

Compare PastPaperHero's subscription offering to the wider market

PastPaperHero
Monthly Plan
$10
AdaptiBar
One-time Fee
$395
Assessment Day
One-time Fee
$20-39
BarPrepHero
One-time Fee
$299
Job Test Prep
One-time Fee
$90-350
Quimbee
One-time Fee
$1,199

Note the above prices are approximate and based on prices listed on the respective websites as of May 2025. Prices may vary based on location, currency exchange rates, and other factors.

Get unlimited access to thousands of practice questions, flashcards, and detailed explanations. Save over 90% compared to one-time courses while maintaining the flexibility to learn at your own pace.

All-in-one Learning Platform

Everything you need to master your assessments and job tests in one place

  • Comprehensive Content

    Access thousands of fully explained questions and cases across multiple subjects

  • Visual Learning

    Understand complex concepts with intuitive diagrams and flowcharts

  • Focused Practice

    Prepare for assessments with targeted practice materials and expert guidance

  • Personalized Learning

    Track your progress and focus on areas where you need improvement

  • Affordable Access

    Get quality educational resources at a fraction of traditional costs

Tell Us What You Think

Help us improve our resources by sharing your experience

Pleased to share that I have successfully passed the SQE1 exam on 1st attempt. With SQE2 exempted, I’m now one step closer to getting enrolled as a Solicitor of England and Wales! Would like to thank my seniors, colleagues, mentors and friends for all the support during this grueling journey. This is one of the most difficult bar exams in the world to undertake, especially alongside a full time job! So happy to help out any aspirant who may be reading this message! I had prepared from the University of Law SQE Manuals and the AI powered MCQ bank from PastPaperHero.

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Saptarshi Chatterjee

Senior Associate at Trilegal